MY RESPONSE TO CHAT-n-CHAT COMMENTS

Q  J.M. Aboobucker: 


SC order refers to judgementS (plural)
and High Court in Singular. Is it an omission
of letter S or does it has any other meaning?

My response:

• All the three CAs are tagged together and had come up together for hearing on 7/5/2015 and not merely the Jaipur- case- related CA.Besides, the SC has also stated  ” In case, where the amount has not been deposited, needless to emphasize, the Corporation shall pay and question of any kind of withdrawal from court does not arise. “      Deposit made in Chandigarh is not on direction from Supreme Court. No deposit has been made in Delhi HC.

Considering the above the singular used for High Court can be taken as an omission.

• Incidentally, the above-stated remarks of the SC   in inverted commas  also become relevant to post- July 1997 retiree-petitioners under the Jaipur writ who are eligible to receive the benefits of the Jaipur Bench judgment but in respect of whom deposits were not made by LIC.

Greetings,


C H Mahadevan