Q.B.D.Bhargava: Has anyone real meaning
of the order?
My response:
The meaning as I make out is as follows:
- LIC has to pay 20% of arrears due to the original petitioners as per the impugned judgments (note the plural) of the High Court(s) viz. Rajasthan High Court, Punjab & Haryana High Court and Delhi High Court;
- The post-July 1997 retirees who are also petitioners in the Jaipur Writ are also entitled to the 20% interim relief as they are also deemed to have succeeded in the Jaipur case:
- 20% of the amounts deposited in the Jaipur HC Registry have to be released by Jaipur Bench to LIC for payment to the respondent-pensioners:
- It also does not mean that LIC has to pay only the amount deposited; it only means that the pensioners concerned will have to be paid the full amounts due to them as per the Jaipur HC Bench judgment which will be definitely more than what has been deposited in the HC Registry and keep the amount withdrawn from the High Court with itself.
- The release of the amount deposited in the Chandigarh HC Registry is not covered by the SC Order as opined by Mr M Srinivasa Murty as the amount was not paid by LIC as per any order of the Supreme Court but only as undertaken by LIC itself: so the original petitioners of Chandigarh writ will have to be paid interim relief with no tagging of release of the amount by the High Court;
- As far as Delhi case is concerned, all the pre-August 1997-retiree members of the Federation of Retired Class I Officers’ Associations will only be eligible for the interim relief.(Extension of the benefit in rem will arise for all eligible pre-August 1997 retiree Class I Officers of the Corporation only when the final judgment of the SC upholds the Delhi HC judgment on or after 23/9/2015);
- Interim relief has to be paid within six weeks from 7/5/2015.
It is anybody’s guess as to what will be the real meaning of the SC order for LIC!
Greetings.