DELHI MEETING

Dear Editor,

I received the above E Mail just past midnight from KML ASTHANA (12:27 AM) to me

Earlier in the evening, I came across the following E Mail also from Shri KML Asthana, addressed to somebody but forwarded by some one else for select circulation. 

"DEAR ....

I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU THAT WE SHOULD NOT 

FILE FRESH APPLICATION AND NEITHER I HAVE FILED ANY 

APPLICATION IN NOVEMBER 2014 NOR IN DECEMBER 2014.  

I HAVE BEEN TRYING MY BEST FOR EARLY DECISION OF THE CAs. BUT WHAT ABOUT OUR GOOD FRIENDS, WHO INSPITE OF SAYING 'NO' BY OUR PRESIDENT MADE A MENTION IN THE SC ON 13TH NOVEMBER AT A WRONG TIME WITH THE RESULT WE HAVE BEEN SENT BACK TO THE OLD POSITION RATHER STILL BACKWARDS.

FURTHER MORE, MORE THAN ME THERE ARE CERTAINOTHER FORCES WHO ARE PUTTING PRESSURE ON ME TO ARRANGE A MEETING OF ALL THE FOUR ADVOCATES ABOUT MENTIONING IN THE COURT OR MOVE AN APPLICATION WITHOUT THINKING THIS THING CAN BE DECIDED BY US AND ALSO  THE COST INVOLVED IN IT.

I HAVE YET TO FILE MY REPLY IN THE SC. I WOULD REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN IN THE MATTER. THOUGH I HAVE SUCCESSFULLY BEEN FIGHTING THE ISSUES

BUT NOW SO MANY GODFATHERS ARE TRYING TO COME OVER MY HEAD. 

BEFORE CLOSING I MUST MAKE A MENTION THAT IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE POSSIBLE THAT SC JUDGES ARE IN COLLUSION WITH BABUS AS HAS BEEN EXPRESSED IN YOUR MESSAGE. I MAY ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT I DID NOT WITHDRAW THE CONTEMPT PETITION EITHER AT SC OR AT JAIPUR.  IF ANYONE CAN APPRECIATE THE TONE AND TENOR OF THE ORDER HAS CAN VERY WELL APPRECIATE THAT IT WAS NOT ON ACCOUNT OF MY WITHDRAWING BUT FOR SOME OTHER REASONS. 

I HAVE EXPLAINED THIS MANY TIMES AND I AM NOT GOING TO EXPLAIN AGAIN AND AGAIN. I HAVE BEEN WINNING ALL THE TIME ON MY OWN SHOULDERS SINGLY ON THE LEGAL SIDE BUT IF ONE OR TWO HICCUPS ARISE PEOPLE SHOULD REACT IN SUCH A MANNER? IT IS REALLY STRANGE.

ANY WAY THANKS FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS

KML ASTHANA"

Thanks and regards,

M. Sreenivasa Murty