12 Jul 16, 03:37 PM
Sdsarma: Sri GNS said that Hyderabad petition is opposed by him since it causes delay in disposal of the case, but now his and KMLAs actions are causing delay and Delhi H C has pulled up them along with LIC for not adhering to time schedule set by SC. May be they and their collection agents are busy collecting donations from gullible pensioners instead of filing documents in the Delhi HC as directed by the SC. Pensioner are requested to be beware of the cheaters, like person who withdrew contempt petition accusing the judge is not aware of law who dismissed the contempt as withdrawn.
12 Jul 16, 12:00 PM
12 Jul 16, 01:22 PM
12 Jul 16, 12:00 PM
Bhaktavatsalarao.k: There is no surprise in the flash news. We would have been surprised had the arguments continued. Even on earlier occasion, Delhi HC directed the parties to come prepared for arguments on and from 12.7.16. What happened now. Nobody is worried of H C directive. There is no guarantee that on 4.8.16 all the parties will come prepared and participate in the hearing. The lazy officials are sleeping in the offices at the cost of public money. The Advocates are proposing repeated adjournments. The case managers are collecting funds in the name of court cases. All are happy in one way or the other. Only the poor pensioners of LIC ARE THE LONE SUFFERERS.
B.R.Mehta: LIC Pensioners must understand this game very clearly that all case managers just need funds but are not ready to expose LIC for its casual compliance of supreme court order regarding 40% IR Payment. Only Hyderabad Association exposed LIC today at Delhi High Court and hence Court directed LIC to file fresh affidavit explaining how 40% IR Payment is calculated by them. LIC Pensioners must rise above their blind loyalty to their respective case managers to support financially the only genuine case manager which is Hyderabad Association.
12 Jul 16, 02:40 PM
G.Krishna Prasad.: I am sure that average pensioners are not gullible enough to go by the hype created by one sided version of what happened or did not happen in the court based mainly on a smile or a frown or any other mannerism. People should concentrate on briefing their counsels and do similar constructive acts instead of trying to provoke people.
12 Jul 16, 02:40 PM
G.Krishna Prasad.: I am sure that average pensioners are not gullible enough to go by the hype created by one sided version of what happened or did not happen in the court based mainly on a smile or a frown or any other mannerism. People should concentrate on briefing their counsels and do similar constructive acts instead of trying to provoke people.