From MSM Sir's letter part 2, it is understood that KMLA had filed STAY PETITION AGAINST IMPLEMENTATION NOTIFICATION. In this regard I would like to know WHO HAS AUTHORISED SRI KMLA to file such application against implementation notification and on whose behalf the vakalat was given? what purpose will it serve? Our fight is for upgradation and not against wage revision. By filing too many petitions we are complicating the matter before the Court. Let there be consensus amongst our leaders and Advocates.
2 Feb 16, 05:08 PM
G. Narayanaswamy: Delay for the pensioners, it is all. Delay in getting Justice is distressing. Only silver lining is the observation of the Judge on delay. All seems to be a riddle wrapped in mystery inside an enigma. Let us unite in our experiences. And get what is due to us and just.
KML ASTHANA WRITES HE "HAD CORRECTLY FILED THE STAY APPLICATIONS AND THAT IS WHY PAYMENT WAS MADE OVERNIGHT TO THE EMPLOYEES. HE (SHRI MURTY) DOES NOT KNOW THE CONTENTS OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS BUT IS TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE BY CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT AND OBJECT OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS. SHRI ASTHANA ADDS THAT SHRI MURTY IS DOING SO UNDER THE PRESSURE OF LIC AND AIIPA AND MISGUIDING THE PENSIONERS."
To read the full text of his statement, please click below.
To read the full text of his statement, please click below.
IT IS A TOTALLY FALSE STATEMENT TO SAVE HIS FACE AND MISDEEDS COMMITTED
SO FAR IN THE WAY OF SUCCESS. HE HAS TO EXPLAIN-
WHERE HE WAS WHEN HE RETIRED, WHETHER HE DID NOT KNOW THE ANOMALIES FOR WHICH HE IS FIGHTING NOW AFTER KMLA HAD WON ALL THE BATTLES IN THE HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR IN THE MATTER OF ANOMALIES IN DA/DR, REVISION OF PAY SCALES FROM TIME TO TIME,
SO FAR IN THE WAY OF SUCCESS. HE HAS TO EXPLAIN-
WHERE HE WAS WHEN HE RETIRED, WHETHER HE DID NOT KNOW THE ANOMALIES FOR WHICH HE IS FIGHTING NOW AFTER KMLA HAD WON ALL THE BATTLES IN THE HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR IN THE MATTER OF ANOMALIES IN DA/DR, REVISION OF PAY SCALES FROM TIME TO TIME,
WHERE HIS LEGAL WISDOM HAD GONE,
I WON THE TWO WRIT PETITIONS AND THEN SPECIAL APPEALS AND THEN THE FIRST SLP OF 2011 IN THE SC AND THEN THE REVIEW PETITIONS AND THEREAFTER SLPS OF LIC OF THE YEAR 2011
AND NOW WHEN THE SLP OF2013 IS AT THE FINAL STAGE THIS GREAT MAN HAS COME ON THE SURFACE. EVEN CHANDIGARH AND DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED ON THE BASIS OF JAIPUR JUDGMENT,
WHERE HE WAS THEN?
WHETHER HE IS FIGHTING WITH KMLA OR WITH LIC?
WHETHER IF KMLA WILL LEAVE THE CASE IT WILL BE HIS VICTORY AGAINST LIC?
WHETHER HE IS FIGHTING WITH KMLA OR WITH LIC?
WHETHER IF KMLA WILL LEAVE THE CASE IT WILL BE HIS VICTORY AGAINST LIC?
WHETHER ANY USEFUL BENEFIT WILL BE GAINED WHEN AN UNSUCCESSFUL CRUSADER LIKE THE ONE TAKES OVER WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW THE FACTS AND LAW OF THE CASE SO FAR
WHETHER IT IS NOT HE ON ACCOUNT OF HIS WRONG FACTS THE PENSIONER PETITIONERS ARE SUFFERING?
WHY HIS SR ADVOCATE WAS NOT PRESENT AND WHY HE COULD NOT SPEAK ANYTHING BEFORE THE COURT.
WHETHER AFTER TAKING OVER THE CASE FROM CHANDIGARH HE HAD RAISED ANY OBJECTION ABOUT THE METHOD OF DEALING WITH THE PENSIONERS IN THE MATTER OF COMPLIANCE OF THE JUDGEMENT IN P&H HIGH COURT?
WHETHER THERE WAS ANY BENEFIT TO HIM WHEN HE OBJECTED LIC TO WITHDRAW THE 20% AND GIVE A GROUND NOT TO MAKE PAYMENT OF 20% NOT ONLY ONCE BUT THRICE. WHAT BENEFIT HE GAINED.
KMLA HAD CORRECTLY FILED THE STAY APPLICATIONS AND THAT IS WHY PAYMENT WAS MADE OVERNIGHT TO THE EMPLOYEES. HE DOES NOT KNOW THE CONTENTS OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS BUT IS TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE BY CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT AND OBJECT OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS. HE IS DOING SO UNDER THE PRESSURE OF LIC AND AIIPA AND MISGUIDING THE PENSIONERS.
HE IS CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT THAT AIRIEF AND KMLA HAD LONG BACK FILED APPLICATIONS IN THE SC FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE APPEALS BUT HE HAS NOW FILED ONE AND THAT TOO WITH UTTER FAILURE.
RATHER IT WAS ON ACCOUNT OF HIS THIS ENDEAVOUR THAT THE FINAL HEARING HAS BEEN DELAYED OTHERWISE THE CASE MAY HAVE BEEN DECIDED IN THE FIRST OR THE SECOND WEEK OF FEBRUARY AS PER THE LIST. WHETHER THIS ACT IS IN THE INTEREST OF PENSIONERS?
WHETHER HIS FIGHT WITH AND ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KMLA WILL GIVE ANY BENEFIT TO THE BENEFITS WHEN KMLA HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL AND HE HAD FAILED/HE SHOULD DESIST FROM MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AND CONTUMACIOUS REMARKS AGAINST KMLA OR AIRIEF INSTEAD CONCENTRATE ON THE LITIGATION WITH LIC IF HE REALLY WANTS THAT THE PENSIONERS GET ANY BENEFIT. AND NO LITIGATION ENSUES BETWEEN THEM
IT IS AIRIEF ALONE WHICH HAS BEEN FIGHTING FOR THE CAUSE OF THE PENSIONERS AND SUCH PERSONS FOR THEIR ULTERIOR REASONS ARE TRYING TO CREATE HURDLES AND MAKING UNWANTED HUE AND CRY/ IT IS ON ACCOUNT OF KMLA FOR THE AIRIEF THAT ALL THE PENSIONERS GOT 3000 AGAINST GOLD COIN, WHEN IT WAS NOT GIVEN, WHERE HE WAS, WHETHER HE COULD NOT CONCEIVE THIS?
HE DOES NOT EXIST AT THE MOMENT IN THE ENTIRE LITIGATION AND SUCH TYPE OF ALLEGATIONS WILL NOT GIVE HIM ANY ROAD TO SUCCESS.
KML ASTHANA
KML ASTHANA