DEAR ALL LIC PENSIONERS,
THE APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MSM CAME UP TODAY IN THE SC WITH GREAT
POMP AND SHOW ON THE PARTOF PANCHUKLA CASE MANAGERS, BUT WHEN THE CASE CAMEUP
THEIR SENIOR ADVOCATE DID NOT APPEAR AND MURTY SIR DID NOT SPEAK ANYTHING AND
HE DESIRED OUR ADVOCATE SHRI RK SINGH TO SPEAK, BUT HOW HE HAD NO POWER. THEN
ON THE APPLICATION HIS LORDSHIP SAID THAT IT WILL BE HEARD ALONG WITH THE FINAL
HEARING AS USUAL. THEN OUR RK SINGH PRAYED FOR FIXING THE CASE FOR FINAL
DECISION ON 3RD OR 10TH FEBRUARY BUT ON 3RD FEBRUARY THE COURT WAS LIKELY TO BE
BUSY IN CONSTITUTION AND ON10TH FEBRUARY AS USUAL THE ADVOCATE GENERAL SAID TO
BE BUSY ELSEWHERE AS ALSO ON 23RD FEBRUARY. OUR RK SINGH OPPOSED AND SAID THAT
IT IS A PLOY OF LIC TO TAKE TIME IN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER FOR THE LAST
ABOUT ONE AND HALF YEAR AND HAS SAID THAT IN CASE THE PRESENT SENIOR ADVOCATE
DOES NOT HAVE TIME LIC SHOULD ENGAGE SOME OTHER ADVOCATE THERE IS NO DEARTH OF
THEM OR ELSE COST MAY BE IMPOSED.
ULTIMATELY THE COURT WAS PLEASED TO ORDER FOR FIXING THE CASE ON 10TH
MARCH,2016 AT NUMBER ONE.
I WAS SAYING THAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE FRUITLESS SINCE THE
COURT DECIDES INTERIM APPLICATIONS ALONG WITH FINAL HEARING BUT MR MSM AND MORE
THAN HIM HIS BHAKT BR MEHTA WERE POSING MUCH ADO FOR NOTHING AND WHAT HAPPENED
IS WHAT I WAS SAYING. ALL THESE MENTIONS AND MENTIONS BOASTED HAVE GONE WASTE.
HOWEVEER, IT CAN BE USED TO CONFUSE AND MISLEAD THE PENSIONERS.
HE HAS IN ONE OF HIS MESSAGE SAID THAT I HAVE NOT TAKEN
ANY ACTION IN THIS DIRECTION BUT I SAY THAT I HAD FILED APPLICATION ON BEHALF
OF AIRIEF FOR IMPLEADMENT IN THE MONTH OF MARCH 2014. THIS IS ON JOLT TO HIS
ALLEGATION AGAINST ME AND SHOWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE WELFARE OF THE
PENSIONERS.BUT ONLY IN MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ME. I WILL RESPOND TO
HIS OTHER ALLEGATIONS.
I MAY SAY THAT THIS APPLICATION WAS A FUTILE EFFORT JUST
TO GAIN PUBLICITY. THE DELHI HC WRIT WAS FOR DR TO CLASS I ONLY AND NOT
FOR REVISION OF PENSIONS WHILE THE JAIPUR WRITS ARE FOR FOR BOTH ONE FOR DR
ANOMALY AND THE OTHER FOR PENSION REVISION AS AND WHEN PAY SCALES ARE REVISED
AND THAT IS COVERING ALL THE CLASSES, I, II, III AND IV. BUT THE EGO OF SOME
DOES NOT LEAVE THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE RETIRED AND COME IN CLASS V.
WITH BEST WISHES,
KML ASTHANA
29/1/216
29/1/216