* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Friday, June 05, 2015

QUA or IN REM is the crucial question


For Health and Wealth of Pensioners : Excerpts from Archives



The Editor has focused in the editorial , 
" Supreme Court Case" on the most vital issue of
applicability of the prospective/impending 
judgement of the Supreme Court after September
hearings : will the judgement be 
in Rem- applicable to all the pensioners or Qua- 
only to respondent employees (pensioners). 

The matter should not be taken lightly. 
It deserves serious consideration by all those 
who matter most. May they take it as a 
matter of life and death. 

May act swiftly to remedy the shortcomings, 
the pitfalls, if any. 
May they ensure that the pensioners at 
large are not left in the lurch. Remember 
that the time at disposal is short.

The pensioners must keep their spirit high. They must try to rejuvenate their feelings by 
reading some excerpts reproduced below from the LICPC Archives.

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH.
ORDER OF HON'BLE JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI : Date of Order - 12 th January, 2010.
1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6676/1998 Krishna Murari Lal Asthana Vs. Union of India & Ors.
2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.654/2007 KMLAsthana & Ors. Vs. L.I.C. of India & Ors. 
..The petitioners are those who retired from the service of Life Insurance Corporation of India. First ground raised by the petitioners and common in both the writ petitions is regarding discrimination in grant of pensionary benefits. It is stated that on 28.6.1995, LIC of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995  were notified. The Pension Rules were made applicable to the employees, who were in service of the respondent Corporation on or after 1.1.1986, on their exercising options to be governed by the Pension Rules and refunding the contribution of provident fund with interest...Learned counsel for petitioners, advancing the arguments for first issue, submitted that non-grant of due benefit of dearness allowance to the retired employees is not only arbitrary but discriminatory in nature. After filing of the writ petition by Krishna Murari Lal Asthana, the LIC itself passed a resolution in its meeting held on 24.11.2001. On realizing the mistake, the LIC decided to sort out the issue by proper remedy, but finally left it to the discretion of the Union of India to take a final decision. If the resolution dated 24.11.2001 is implemented, then grievance of the petitioners can come to an end....... there can be no different basis for dearness allowance or other benefits to those retired on or before 31.7.1997. The existing pensioners are entitled for the benefit of dearness allowance with the same measure as is admissible to the pensioners on or after 31.7.1997...and up gradation by giving weight age of 11.25% as in the case of in - service employees... The discrimination amongst the pensioners on that count is not permissible and if there exists rule, making discrimination amongst the existing pensioners, it is held to be violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India...
..there cannot be a cut off date for existing pensioners for providing benefits but further fact is that to cure the aforesaid mistake, the Board's resolution should have been given effect to, which will otherwise redress the entire grievance of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that resolution passed by the Board of LIC does not need approval of the Central Government thus the Corporation may give effect to its resolution dated 24.11.2001 to avoid discrimination amongst existing pensioners.
In light of the discussion made above, both the writ petitions are allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to take a decision for implementation of the resolution dated 24.11.2001 passed by the Board. The respondent Corporation cannot provide different criteria for grant of dearness allowance to the existing pensioners based on cut off date i.e. 31.7.1997. The benefit arising out of the directions above would, however, be considered by the respondent Corporation so that every retired employee may get the same benefit.
(M.N. BHANDARI) 
INDIAN EXPRESS - CHENNAI - 25-01-2011 - PAY EQUAL PENSION TO ALL THE LIC RETIREES:
HC The Rajasthan High court has come down heavily on the "inaction" of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) for not adhering to its Board resolution to pay equal pension to all the retirees across the country irrespective of their date of retirement. The Division Bench of Justice Dalip Singh and Mahesh Bagavathi directed LIC to give effect to its Board decision dated November 24 2001 to revise the pension and dearness allowance(DA) payable to its retired employees corresponding to the successive revisions of the pay scales that took place in 1986,1993,1997,2002 and 2007 respectively.
          SN( a 1992 pensioner)