* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Monday, June 08, 2015

LIC's problem ?


I reproduce an interesting portion from Shri Murty’s recent post.
  • “ED (P) asked me “Mr Murty, we have Petitioners in Jaipur and we have them in Chandigarh but whom do we pay to, in Delhi?” I mentally thanked GNS profusely for becoming such a formidable hurdle to LIC for once, in spite of his unstinted cooperation with LIC & Government and I replied “Agarwalji, please read the last line on page 4 of my Memorandum – you have to pay to ALL or you (read: LIC) are in ‘trouble’ for sure.”
  • Being a Class I Officers Association leader, Shri Murty should have replied “To all Class I Officers who are Delhi HC petitioners."  Knowing well that his Hyderabad Class I Officers Association admittedly is not eligible for 20% amount, he  pleaded “My lord, to all”!
  • Again in his Memorandum, he does not plead for Class I Officers. He writes: “As far as the Delhi HC Petitioners are concerned, how, how much and to whom the 20% shall be paid will be another exercise in vacuum.”

S.S. GUPTA
Retd. Pre-97 Class I Officer