Sampath Iyengar’s poser why the case mangers have not approached the SC for clarification of their order is understandable as he being not a petitioner in none of the court cases is entitled to get 20% of the arrears especially when the SC order says that the payment to be made in favour of the ‘RESPONDENT EMPLOYEES ‘. So far to my knowledge, maybe I am right or wrong there was no order of any court which says that the relief is SPECIFICALLY granted to the petitioners only. It is the general court norm to pass an order to pay to the petitioners in the suit. Further the SC order says ‘ the petitioner- Corporation shall release 20 % of the amount as per the impugned judgments pertaining to the High court ( Here HC means Jaipur HC ) When Jaipur HC has admitted both the writs of Shri Asthanaji, one relating to the removal DA ANOMALY and the other relating to PENSION UPDATION in accordance with the Board resolution it therefore naturally follows without any doubt that the DR arrears consist of these two elements and one without the other is a blatant negation of Jaipur HC order which may lead to the contempt of court. The arithmetic of the calculation guided by our expert actuaries and Chartered Accountants, I am sure, will not go with any inaccuracy unless it was willfully done with a motive.
