I am grateful to you for including my
name too in your chosen few of the
enlightened bloggers of our PC with
whom you wanted to be privy to
the second letter from the AW
through your personal email.
The tone and tenor of this letter appears to be little bit subdued and softened. It speaks more of apology and regret for his/her kindling of frustrated and disgusted feelings amongst the senior citizens who are waiting over 14 years for a D Day to their difficulties and aspirations through the only saviour left before them viz. the portals of the Supreme Court of India. That is why it is no wonder that without exception every reader was indignant on reading the AW' s first letter and many illustrious writers had chosen to rebut the arguments advanced by the AW giving out exhaustive and unassailable rebuttals.
In spite of scores of rebuttal responses from many learned bloggers of our PC justifying our case, it is regrettable that the AW has not been convinced about the Pension Upgradation Demand of LIC Pensioners and the AW stay put where he/she wrote his/her first letter.
In fine I feel that the second letter of AW does not deserve to be published by you, for the simple reason that even after your indulgence to give the AW a platform to give vent to the feelings/expressions on the burning issue of LIC Pensioners, despite being an anonymous letter, the AW care a fig about the PC platform and still chose to remain anonymous in the second letter too.
As the Editor of our PC of course you are the ultimate judge/authority and I leave it to the Editorial Wisdom to decide about the publication of the second letter of AW after seeing the mollified feelings the first AW letter had aroused.
J.M. ABOOBUCKER. LEAMINGTON SPA (UK).
(The above mail was received at our end after the second letter Chronicle had distributed to selected contributors.)
In spite of scores of rebuttal responses from many learned bloggers of our PC justifying our case, it is regrettable that the AW has not been convinced about the Pension Upgradation Demand of LIC Pensioners and the AW stay put where he/she wrote his/her first letter.
In fine I feel that the second letter of AW does not deserve to be published by you, for the simple reason that even after your indulgence to give the AW a platform to give vent to the feelings/expressions on the burning issue of LIC Pensioners, despite being an anonymous letter, the AW care a fig about the PC platform and still chose to remain anonymous in the second letter too.
As the Editor of our PC of course you are the ultimate judge/authority and I leave it to the Editorial Wisdom to decide about the publication of the second letter of AW after seeing the mollified feelings the first AW letter had aroused.
Thanking you and with kind regards
J.M. ABOOBUCKER. LEAMINGTON SPA (UK).
(The above mail was received at our end after the second letter Chronicle had distributed to selected contributors.)