MR. HK AGGARWAL RAISES TWO QUESTIONS
1.
AT 3/25/2015 11:58:00 AM.. NIDESH
ABSENT. WEATHER WAS ROUGH. SAVLA HAS HIS SAY NOT TO LET THE MATTER OUT OF
CONTROL.
2.
AT 3/25/2015 02:01:00 PMT, Mr.Savla
intervened out of turn and requested the bench to let the Govt. in, hear
its appeals and decide the matter.
QUESTION
NO. I. NORMALLY PETITIONERS WILL PLACE THEIR POINTS
& MAKE APPEALS FORCEFULLY & IT IS FOR THE COURT TO DECIDE
UPON THE APPEALS BEING MADE BY THE PETITIONERS, AND THE ADVOCATES OF THE
RESPONDENTS WILL TRY TO COUNTER THE ARGUMENTS/SUCH MOVES, BUT HERE AS REPORTED
BY SH SREENIVASA MURTY, MR. SAVLA COUNSEL IN CHANDIGARH CASE INTERVENED
OUT OF TURN AND REQUESTED THE BENCH TO LET GOVT. IN, HEAR ITS APPEALS AND
DECIDE THE MATTER. AS REPORTED THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 8.4.14.
WHAT DOES SUCH AN ACT OF THE RESPONDENT
ADVOCATE REFLECTS ?
QUESTION
NO. 2. THERE IS NO MENTION OF SH RK SINGH
ADVOCATE (IN JAIPUR CASE) IN THE ABOVE TWO REPORTS SENT FROM THE SC PREMISES
ABOUT TODAY'S PROCEEDINGS IN THE SC, WHICH WERE PROMPTLY PUBLISHED IN THE
BLOGS, AND THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO HOW AND WHY A MALICIOUS REPORTING ABOUT
THE ROLE OF ADVOCATE SH RK SINGH HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BLOGS WITHOUT VERIFYING
THE FACTS ?
FRIENDS, IT IS NO TIME TO OFFEND ANY BODY
BUT ONE MUST BE MATURE ENOUGH NOT TO WRITE ANY MATTER WHICH CREATES CONFUSION
AND MISINFORMATION/ MISUNDERSTANDING AT THIS CRUCIAL POINT OF TIME. NEED OF THE
HOUR IS TO HAVE PATIENCE AND AVOID PREJUDICES. REMAIN UNITED FOR THE COMMON
CAUSE OF ALL LIC EMPLOYEES (BOTH IN-SERVICE & RETIRED).
WISH ALL GOOD HEALTH AND GOOD TIMES
AHEAD.
REGARDS
H K AGGARWAL.