We wish to inform our readers that the news published on 3rd September about the Bank pensioners winning their case of 100% DR was not based on an authentic report. This 'source' did not have dependable details with him. It appears this reader from Pune who had sent this piece of information (not 'report') was trying to have more details from LIC pensioners. The post we had published and withdrawn later is reproduced here.
We received some comments from the readers, now that a 'constitution' bench has also held that any cut off date is arbitrary, 100% DR neutralization is a certainty. And so these readers visualised a possibility of GNS retiring. This resulted in a cartoon, also since withdrawn, reproduced here.
![]() |
Plucking the easier ones... GNS was more practical in his approach. |
We have now received a letter, reproduced below,
The above mail too appears to carry mistakes.
Supreme Court site shows the present position of the case as follows:-
MAIL FROM M. PERUMAL
After the unfavourable Judgment of the DB-MHC,
the Litigants filed SLPs in the Supreme Court.
The Court heard the SLPs SLP (Civil)
28220-28221 / 2013 on 16/9/13 and converted
them as Civil Appeal vide CA8420-21/2013
Though the Judges ordered " List it expeditiously",
the CAs are still pending and not yet listed for SC's
regular hearing.
***********************
Case Details
Appeal Civil
8420-8421 / 2013
STATUS PENDING
Petitioner A.B KASTHURIRANGAN & ORS
Vs.
Respondent CANARA BANK & ORS.
Advocate(Petitioner) MR. V. G. PRAGASAM
Advocate(Respondent) Not Available
Appealed Against High Court Details - Not Available
Matter is Connected To Connected Details - Not Available
Subject Matter SERVICE MATTERS - RETIRAL BENEFITS
Listing Details Last Listed On - 16/09/2013
Thursday, September 04, 2014 - 1:57:21 PM
*************
M.Perumal (Bank Pensioner blog)*as informed by RK Sahni.