* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Sunday, September 21, 2014




IT IS REALLY STRANGE THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO TALK WITH ME ON THIS SUBJECT TILL DATE EITHER BY MR MS MURTY OR MR GN SRIDHARAN STILL THEY ARE TAKING MY NAME.

THEY ARE TRYING TO TAKE CREDIT OF THE APPLICATIONS WHICH I HAVE ALREADY MOVED IN THE COURT FOR SEGREGATION OF THE DA/DR SLP AND UPGRADATION OF PENSION SLP AND MADE A REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND PAYMENT OF ARREARS OR AT LEAST FROM THE CURRENT MONTH AND DISMISSAL OF THE TWO SLPS.
NONE OF THE TWO HAS ANY SAY IN JAIPUR SLPS EXCEPT CREATING HURDLES. DELHI SLP, WHICH IS THERE, SLP CONCERNS ONLY DA/DR MATTER WITH WHICH I HAVE LEFT IT OVER TO THEM.  I AM MORE CONCERNED WITH UPWARD REVISION.

AS FAR AS EARLY DECISION IS CONCERNED IT IS TO INFORM ALL CONCERNED THAT EVEN FOR THE PRESENT SLPS ARE NOT FOR FINAL DECISION BUT ON THE IAs ALREADY PENDING. FURTHER MORE UNTIL AND UNLESS THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES  OF DECEASED RESPONDENTS ARE ISSUED NOTICES FINAL DECISION DOES NOT SEEM TO BE POSSIBLE.  IN CASE THEY WANT TO WORK TOGETHER THEY SHOULD NOT PLAY THE GAME AT MY BACK AS HAD BEEN DONE WHILE MOVING THE APPLICATION IN CHANDIGARH SLP, OF WHICH THERE IS NO INFORMATION FROM EITHER OF THEM NOR A COPY HAS BEEN GIVEN, IT WAS NOT THOUGHT THAT CLUBBING IT WILL CREATE PROBLEMS
FOR US OTHERWISE I COULD HAVE ALSO MOVED AN APPLICATION. I HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THAT APPLICATION TILL TODAY AND NOW THEY SAY MY CONSENT IS IN THE OFFING, REALLY STRANGE.

MY APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT AND INTERIM RELIEF IN CHANDIGARH MATTER IS ALREADY PENDING SINCE APRIL. THEREFORE WHAT WAS THE NECESSITY OF MOVING ANOTHER APPLICATION? 

SIMILARLY EARLIER ALSO MR GNS HAD FILED AN APPLICATION IN DELHI HC SLP FOR DEPOSIT OF THE AMOUNT DUE TOWARDS DA/DR ON THE LINES AS HAD BEEN DONE IN JAIPUR HC, KNOWING FULLY WELL THAT THE SAID DEPOSIT WAS NOT PROPER AND OPPOSED BY ME. MOREOVER, WHERE WAS THE QUESTION OF
DEPOSIT WHY NOT PAYMENT AND TO WHOM THE NAMES HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN. THEY ARE CONFINING THEIR CASE TO THEIR ASSOCIATION ONLY AND THAT TOO WITHOUT GIVING THE NAMES IN RESPECT OF WHOM THE AMOUNT WAS SOUGHT TO BE DEPOSITED.  TILL DATE HE HAS NOT GIVEN ME A COPY OF THIS VAGUE AND AMBIGUOUS APPLICATION EXCEPT TO HINDER THE SMOOTH PROGRESS OF THE CASE UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES.

  • HOWEVER I AM READY TO WORK TOGETHER BUT IF THE INTENTIONS OF ALL THE PARTIES ARE FAIR AND CLEAR, LET THEM CONTACT ME AND TELL ME THEIR STRATEGY BEFORE I CAN GIVE MY CONSENT.

FOR IMPLEADMENT KNOWING FULLY WELL THAT DELHI SLP HAS BEEN CLUBBED WITH JAIPUR IT WAS PROPER FOR HIM TO HAVE PROVIDED ME A COPY OF THE PAPER BOOK SO THAT I CAN BE READY TO BEAR THAT ATTACK WHILE OPPOSING SLPS IN JAIPUR CASE.  BUT THAT HAS NOT BEEN DONE.
THIS SMACKS SOME ULTERIOR MOVE

KML ASTHANA