We are publishing the letter from Shri LSRK Rao.
There is nothing wrong in raising the doubts/comments like
(1) "Then the purpose of UNIFIED ACTION a MIRAGE?"
(2) "What happened to the Unity Struggles of Shri MSM?" etc.
There is nothing wrong in raising the doubts/comments like
(1) "Then the purpose of UNIFIED ACTION a MIRAGE?"
(2) "What happened to the Unity Struggles of Shri MSM?" etc.
It is a welcome initiative that Shri Rao has been intervening
in the matter and constantly asking questions.
in the matter and constantly asking questions.
His mails are seen marked to
Seetha And Kishore (rbkseetha@yahoo.com);
Madhava rao (madhava36@yahoo.com);
KML ASTHANA (asthanajaipur40@gmail.com);
vcindore@gmail.com (vcindore@gmail.com);
hkaggarwal36@yahoo.com (hkaggarwal36@yahoo.com);
pggangadharan@hotmail.com (pggangadharan@hotmail.com).
Madhava rao (madhava36@yahoo.com);
KML ASTHANA (asthanajaipur40@gmail.com);
vcindore@gmail.com (vcindore@gmail.com);
hkaggarwal36@yahoo.com (hkaggarwal36@yahoo.com);
pggangadharan@hotmail.com (pggangadharan@hotmail.com).
It is felt that Shri Rao could collect the responses from the side of the Federation in the
matter and come out with proposals/terms for unity talks, so that the pensioners would be
able to know what comes in the way of unity as proposed and Federation's views
in the matter. In addition to Shri Murty, we will welcome Shri LSRK Rao also to do the
mediation role. - Ed.
Sir,
I have to thank Shri Mahadevan for his reply in response to my doubts on the Unity move of Shri MSM.
Shri Mahadevan has given a reply in response to my letter, but the reply is evasive and vague. A reply is given for the sake of reply? How UNITY becomes possible without unified demand? He says the purpose for united action is different, how it could be possible without the inclusion or amendment of the affidavit of Shri GNS?
Then the purpose for UNIFIED ACTION a MIRAGE?
Shri Ch. Mahadevan mentions that in his opinion the demands of Shri MSM are as possible viz:
· 1. Removal of DR anomaly from 1/11/1993 or date of retirement, whichever is later, for pre-August 1997 retirees and 100% D.R. neutralization w.e.f 1/8/1997 with upgradation of pension;
·2. Revision of pension for pre-Aug 1997 retirees on subsequent wage revision dates also from 1/8/2002 and 1/8/2007; and
· 3. Upgradation and revision of pension for all post- July 1997 retirees also.
But, the demands of Shri GNS are different and so far as we know Shri GNS did not amend his demands or did not submit modified affidavit. In such a situation where is the possibility for a UNITED ACTION on the D DAY 12 08 2014 in the Supreme Court of India?
What happened to the Unity Struggles of Shri MSM?
All are intellectuals then a solution can be arrived at with a definite plan but not with a different view point which seems to be absurd at the present moment?
With greetings,
L S R KRISHNA RAO