MOST OF US ARE NOT AWARE OF THE CASE FILED IN JAIPUR HIGH COURT BY SHRI ASTHANA,UP TO THE THE YEAR 1998. ALL THE PENSIONERS KNOW THE DETAILS OF THE CASE AND JUDGEMENT FROM 12 10 2010. ALL OF US ARE AWARE THAT K M L ASTHANA FILED A CASE 6678/1998 IN 1998; 2) 654/2007 IN 2007. FINALLY ON 12 10 2010 THE JUDGEMENT IS DELIVERED BY SJ M N BHANDARI ADMITTED THE TWO WRITS AND ADVISED LIC TO IMPLEMENT THE BOARD RESOLUTION DATED 24 11 2001. BUT THE L I C DID NOT IMPLEMENT ITS OWN RESOLUTION DT 24 11 2001.
THE L I C HAS GONE TO THE DIVISION BENCH OF JAIPUR AND THEIR APPEAL IS DISMISSED. MORE OVER ADVISED L I C TO IMPLEMENT THE BOARD RESOLUTION UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF THEIR JUDGEMENT --- L I C DID NOT OBLIGE.
L I C FILED A REVIEW PETITION IN JAIPUR H C AND FILED AN SLP IN THE SUPREME COURT. REVIEW PETITION FILED IN JAIPUR HIGH COURT IS DISMISSED. THE SLP FILED IN THE SUPREME COURT IS ALSO DISMISSED. - LIC DID NOT IMPLEMENT THE COURT ORDER.
L I C AGAIN FILED SLP IN THE SUPREME COURT WHICH WAS ALSO DISMISSED AND PERMITTED LIC TO FILE AFRESH SLP AND IT WILL BE CONSIDERED ON ITS OWN MERITS. THE SUPREME COURT CONVERTED THE SLP IN TO CIVIL APPEAL AND MENTIONED THAT THERE IS NO STAY ON THE JAIPUR HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT. – BUT LIC DID NOT HONOUR THE SUPREME COURT ORDER.
THE JUDGEMENT OF ANY HIGH COURT IS BINDING ON ANY INSTITUTION INCLUDING THE UOI. “L I C IS A STATE, THE JUDGEMENT OF ANY HIGH COURT SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN TOTO. (MADRAS HIGH COURT)” - BUT L I C IS AVOIDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COURT ORDERS.
THE JUDGEMENT OF CHANDIGARH AND ALSO OF DELHI ARE BASED ON M N BHANDARI JUDGEMENT ONLY. RECENTLY, SOME UNWANTED CRITICISM KNOWINGLY ARE UNKNOWINGLY STARTED CRITICISING SHRI K M L ASTHANA, MAY BE FROM A MEMBER OR FROM A NON MEMBER COMMENTING ON EVERY ACTIVITY ON EVERY POINT ALMOST SERIOUS CRITICISM LEVELLED AGAINST, WHICH IS NOT GOOD IN THE INTEREST OF THE ORGANISATION. THE VERY SAME PERSON IS NOT ABLE TO SPELL HOW FAR THE UNITY TALKS HAVE REACHED WITH SHRI GNS? HE IS NOT TRANSPARENT IN HIS REPORTING!
ONE CAN ADVISE AS A MEMBER THROUGH PERSONAL APPROACH THROUGH ORGANISATIONAL NORMS AND FORMS BUT IT CROSSED CERTAIN LEVEL. THIS IS STARTED FROM THE PAST 6 MONTHS WHICH IS NOT HEALTHY IN THE ORGANISATIONAL INTEREST. I HOPE THE WISDOM DO PREVAIL ON HIM TO MAINTAIN DECORUM IN HIS EXPRESSION AND ALSO IN HIS THOUGHTS. I AGREE THAT THERE IS DELAY IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS FOR THAT SHRI ASTHANA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS LIKE THAT. WE ARE NOT LIVING IN UTOPIAN COUNTRY. ONE THING WE SHOULD REMEMBER THE DELAY IS NOT TOO MUCH. EVEN FOR THAT SHRI K M L ASHTANA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE?
SOMEONE HAS MENTIONED ‘EGO CLASH’. WE KNOW WHAT SHRI ASTHANA IS, HIS VIRTUE, GOODNESS TO ACCEPT EVERYBODY’S OPINION HAS BROUGHT TO A STAGE FOR FINAL CULMINATION OF STRUGGLE ON AT JAIPUR ON 21 07 2014, FINALLY ON 12 08 2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT.
WE NEED TO APPRECIATE THE TRANSPARENCY WHATEVER IS HAPPENED AT 11 O’ CLOCK AT JAIPUR HIGH COURT OR AT THE SUPREME COURT, THE PENSIONER AT MADRAS, A PENSIONER AT MACHILIPATNAM AND IN A SMALL PLACE LIKE NUZVID. IT IS THE SINCERITY OF THE LEADERSHIP. FOR THAT WE AS PENSIONERS NEED APPRECIATE.
THE AGE BRINGS MATURITY OF ONE'S THOUGHTS. MY AGE HAS NOT BROUGHT ME THAT MUCH MATURITY AS THE CRITICS DO NATURALLY HAVE! SO, MY APPEAL MAY BE CONSIDERED AS A SUGGESTION FROM YOUR YOUNGER BROTHER. LET US NOT MUDSLING ON OTHERS, LET US HOPE FOR THE BEST FOR PENSIONERS FRATERNITY. LET US STRENGTHEN THE HANDS OF AIRIEF THEREBY WE ARE STRENGTHENING OURSELVES.
IT IS NOT MY INTENTION TO HURT ANY BODY, SUPPORT SHRI K M L ASTHANA, SHRI RB KISHORE SHRI CH MAHADEVAN AND SUPPORT AIRIEF FINALLY LET US BE READY TO ENJOY THE FRUITS IN THE FINAL JUDICIAL BATTLE.
With greetings,
L S R KRISHNA RAO