MR GOPALAN,
I APPRECIATE YOUR VIEWS BUT WHILE DOING SO YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT IT WAS ASTHANA WHO GOT TWO JUDGMENTS IN DIVISION BENCH AT JAIPUR AFTER THE JUDGMENT OF MR JUSTICE BHANDARI AND GOT TWO SLPs DISMISSED IN SC WITHIN A PERIOD OF SOMEWHAT MORE THAN THREE LONG YEARS FROM 12/1/2010 TO 8/8/2013. U MUST ALSO APPRECIATE THAT EVEN THE PENSION MATTER OF THE JUDGES OF THE SC AND HC TOOK 12 YEARS IN THE SC ALONE AND THE MATTERS OF BANKS ARE WAITING THEIR END SINCE 2005. IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER STRATEGY TO FOLLOW YOU ARE FREE TO PURSUE THE SAME AND I WILL BE THE FIRST PERSON TO LEAVE THIS LINE OF LEGAL ACTION. CAN U LET ME KNOW BUT IT SHOULD BE WORTHWHILE AND NOT JUST A SHOW BUSINESS AS SOME PERSONS ARE DOING. U MAY ALSO TAKE OVER THE MATTER IN YOUR HANDS AND RELIEVE ME OF THIS HEAVY BURDEN.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION THE 2ND WAS THE FIRST HEARING OF THE IMPLEMENTATION WRIT PETITIONS AND IN SPITE OUR OBJECTIONS THE COURT GAVE SIX WEEKS TIME TO LIC FOR REPLY AND SAID LET US SEE WHAT THEY SAY WHILE THE WRIT PETITION IS NOT ON MERITS BUT ONLY FOR IMPLEMENTATION. THESE SIX WEEKS INCLUDE THE WHOLE OF THE MONTH OF JUNE WHEN THE COURT WILL BE ON SUMMER VACATIONS. EVEN IF TWO WEEKS TIME WAS GIVEN IT WILL NOT BE LISTED BEFORE 1ST WEEK OF JULY.
THEN I ALSO STATE IN ADVANCE THAT IN CASE THE REPLY IS FILED I WILL HAVE TO SEEK TIME FOR COUNTERING THE SAME. AS AND WHEN A REPLY IS RECEIVED I WILL REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE SPARE YOUR VALUABLE TIME TO COME TO JAIPUR AND DRAFT AND FILE THE REJOINDER THEREIN. I WILL RENDER ALL ASSISTANCE.