 |
| Mumbai High Court example (reproduced from LICPC archives) |
DEAR SH GANGADHARAN,
GOING THRU THE MANY VIEWS EXPRESSED IN LIC PENSIONERS CHRONICLE IN THE LAST FEW DAYS, PENSIONERS ARE CURIOUS & ANXIOUSLY WAITING FOR AN EARLY SOLUTION TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SJ JUDGMENT DATED 12.1.10 IN LETTER AND SPIRIT.
WITH DUE APOLOGY AND REGARDS I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST ANOTHER MOVE, IF FOUND FEASIBLE BY SH KML ASTHANA/AIRIEF AND OTHERS LIKE SH SREENIVASA MURTY, as under:-
NOT WITHSTANDING THE LEGAL PROCESS GOING ON, CAN/SHOULD WE PENSIONERS IN THE AGE GROUP OF 70 AND ABOVE JOINTLY & DIRECTLY APPROACH/APPEAL/REQUEST THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA FOR AN EARLY HEARING & FINAL DISPOSAL OF OUR CASES BY CALLING AND CLUBBING ALL PENDING CASES ON THE PLEA OF INORDINATE DELAY, OUR ADVANCED AGES AND THE FACT 40% (THOUSANDS) OF OUR PENSIONERS HAVE DIED. SOLICIT CONSIDERED OPINIONS IN THIS DIRECTION. SOME OF THE FRIENDS AGREE ON THIS ACTION.
WITH KIND REGARDS, H K AGGARWAL
 |
| Circular says, those eligible should apply for the grant of indulgence... |