Order of Rajasthan HC Jaipur Bench passed on 30th August 2013 is reproduced here for records. The case is listed on 23-9-2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JAIPUR BENCH AT JAIPUR
***
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 760 of 2010
in
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 654 of 2010
***
Krishna Murari Lal Asthana, aged about 71 years, son of late Shri Ram Saran Lal Asthana, resident of B-8, Shanti Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-302006
Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri T.S. Vijayan, Managing Director (ex-Chairman) Life Insurance Corporation of India, Central Office, Yogakshema, Jeevan Bima marg, Mumbai-400 021
2. Shri A.K. Das Gupta, Managing Director, Life insurance Corporation of India, Central Office, Yogakshema, Jeevan Bima Margm Mumbai-400 021
3. Mr.s D. Vijailakshmi, Executive Director (P), Life Insurance Corporation of India, Central Office, Yogakshema, Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai-400 021
4. Shri Rakesh Singh, I.A.S., Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Central Office, Yogakshema, Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai-400 021
Respondents
***
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 760/2010
30.8.2013
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.S. Chauhan
Mr. Abhinav Sharma, for petitioner
Mr. Mahendra Singh, for respondents
The learned counsel for petitioner informed this Court that Application no. 89/2013 has become infructuous. Therefore, the said application is hereby dismissed, having become infructuous.
An application has been filed for impleading new contemners and for taking them or record. According to the applicant, Mr. D.K. Mehrotra has retired as Chairman, and in his place Mr. S.K. Roy has taken over the post of Chairman, LIC Mr. A.K. Dasgupta, who was earlier the Managing Director, he has now retired. His post has now been taken over by Mr. Sushobhan Sarkar. Likewise, Mr. B. Manivannan, who was earlier Executive Director (P), he too has retired from the said post. The present incumbent happens to be Mr. M.R. Kumar. Therefore, Mr. Sushobhan Sarkar, Mr. M.R. Kumar and Mr. S.K. Roy, need to be taken on as new contemnor-respondents.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is hereby allowed. Since the amended cause-title has already been filed, the same shall be on record.
Issue notice to newly added contemner-respondent nos. 6, 7 and 8, to show cause as to why this Contempt Petition should not be allowed for their willful disobedience of the order dated 12.1.2010 passed by this Court. Notices be given “dasti” to the learned counsel for petitioner. Rule is made returnable within two weeks.
List this case after two weeks.
(R.S. Chauhan) J.