* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Wednesday, September 04, 2013

Comments on write up on pension updation by 'a pensioner'.




" Shri G N.Sridharan, the octogenarian leader of Officers’ Association of a great organisation of LIC,surely knows that GOI pensioners have been getting updation of pension along with revision of scales of pay since 1986........................Recently, the family pensioners of RBI, who were getting pension on tapering basis, started getting family pension at 30% of basic pay of the late employee/ pensioner from 12-01-2013. Family pension in LIC and banks should also be revised to 30% of the updated/revised basic pay of late employee/pensioner from the date of his/her demise..... "
- A pensioner.”


THE ABOVE ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN 'LIC PENSIONERS CHRONICLE' CARRIES SIGNIFICANT CITINGS WHICH MAY HELP FOR A FRESH SLP FOR CIVIL APPEAL IN SC TO ARGUE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF BOARD'S DECESION WITHOUT EXPENDING MUCH INK FOR WRITING TO LIC AGAIN AND AGAIN. LET ME CLARIFY :-


Please click below to read more.

ORDER FOR UNIFORM DA:


JAIPUR HIGH COURT CWP 6676 OF 1998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6676/1998
Krishna Murari Lal Asthana Vs. Union of India & Ors.
2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.654/2007
Krishna Murari Lal Asthana & Ors. Vs. L.I.C. of India & Ors.
Date of Order : 12th January, 2010
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
Mr.Abhinav Sharma, Ms.Anita Aggarwal,G.C. - for petitioners
Mr. Anurag Aggarwal, Mr.Manoj Singh Ragav
Mr.S.S. Raghav - for respondents
BY THE COURT:
REPORTABLE
In light of the discussion made above, both the writ petitions are allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to take a decision for implementation of the resolution dated 24.11.2001 passed by the Board. The respondent Corporation cannot provide different criteria for grant of dearness allowance to the existing pensioners based on cut off date i.e. 31.7.1997. The benefit arising out of the directions above would, however, be considered by the respondent Corporation so that every retired employee may get the same benefit. Costs made easy.
(M.N. BHANDARI) J.                                                                                   Sunil, JrPA

COUNTER AFFIDAVIT OF LIC AND GOI  FEARING IMPLICATION IN BANKS :




NOW AS PER ABOVE ARTICLE BY  “A PENSIONER “,  GOVT SHOULD NOT BE AFRAID OF BANKS AS DA PARITY HAS BEEN RESTORED IN MANY A INSTITUTIONS AFTER COURT CASES.  SO IT NEEDS A FRESH JUDICIAL INTERFERENCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF ASTHANAJI.

BASUDEB DAS, KOLKATA.