* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Thursday, July 25, 2013

RK VISWANATHAN



COME 2ND AUGUST
the Supreme court may decide who is right and who is wrong.
  • The appellant, though aware of the law that any issue to be raised for the first time in the supreme court hearing  should essentially be one of law of considerable importance and the entire case cannot be opened at large unless it is shown that substantial and grave injustice has been done and that the case in question presents features of sufficient gravity and warrant a review, would however desperately bring new arguments as a last (lost !) resort to deny what is legally due to the aggrieved pensioners and endorsed in several courts.
  • Relying on catena of  judgments in similar cases it could reasonably be presumed, should truth and justice triumph the expected judgment cannot be otherwise than what justifiably it ought to be.