* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Saturday, December 01, 2012

THE PLIGHT OF LIC PENSIONERS (PART II)


                 V.S. Prakasarao, Visakhapatnam            
prakasarao1942@gmail.com



 

In Part I of his write up, Shri V.S. Prakasarao asked why Shri GN Sridharan seeks
transfer of Writ Petitions to SC. "Will he contest the SLP of LIC and support the
pleadings of Shri Asthana?"  -  Briefly discussing SBI staff agitation, he said, "strike yielded
good results to SBI pensioners.  In LIC "it fell on the lot of Shri Asthana" to
initiate legal battle and Shri Prakasarao goes on to raise doubts
about conflicting styles of behaviour of LIC
management in different matters.
 
 
Now read:  PART II 


IMPLIED APPROVAL - The LIC found deficiencies, discrepancies, hardships in the implementation of the Pension Rules.  So much so they intended to rectify the matters and sought formal approval of the GOI as per Rule 55A (Power to relax) the G.O.I. should have given the approval.  This is a positive rule and should not be used to perpetuate the hardships and deprive the pensioners the benefit to them.  Any delay in this regard shall mean implied approval.  Or it amounts to abdication of its authority.  Thus the long silence by G.O.I. should be taken as approval.  The Rajasthan H.C. opined accordingly.

What for the Rule 56 was framed.  Who has to implement it and when.  It is the responsibility of the Chairman as per Rule 55. Further the G.O.I.  by Notification dated 20-6-2000 empowered the Corporation to  amend the relevant provisions to determine the amount of minimum pension, Dearness Relief and Family Pension.  So the power to amend was delegated to the Corporation again. The last sentence of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Pension Rules states “it is certified that no employee of the Corporation is likely to be affected by the introduction of the Pension Scheme with retrospective effect.”   As such the LIC pensioners has valid ground to get the benefits in terms of the Board’s Resolution dated 24-11-2000. 

Rule 5 of the Pension Rule says that it is the responsibility of the Management to provide sufficient funds to enable the trustees to disburse pension.  G.O.I. has no financial burden in the pension scheme.  The G.O.I. very recently issued Notification u/s. 48(g) whereby the Corporation can now purchase shares of a company up to 30% of the total number.  Hitherto it was only 10%.  So the G.O.I.  is helping business people.  How about the poor pensioners who created the wealth for the LIC and the U.O.I. (Union of India).
CAN THE UNIONS  REMAIN MUTE SPECTATORS
TO THE ONGOING DEVELOPMENTS.
SUCH UNIONS ARE
DOING GREAT DISSERVICE TO THE PENSIONERS.
(Concluded)