* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

Saturday, January 30, 2016

SN Chhabra

TO READ, KML ASTHANA'S LETTER, PLEASE CLICK HERE

DEAR ALL LIC PENSIONERS,

THE APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MSM CAME UP TODAY IN THE SC WITH GREAT POMP AND SHOW ON THE PARTOF PANCHUKLA CASE MANAGERS, BUT WHEN THE CASE CAMEUP THEIR SENIOR ADVOCATE DID NOT APPEAR AND MURTY SIR DID NOT SPEAK ANYTHING AND HE DESIRED OUR ADVOCATE SHRI RK SINGH TO SPEAK, BUT HOW HE HAD NO POWER. THEN ON THE APPLICATION HIS LORDSHIP SAID THAT IT WILL BE HEARD ALONG WITH THE FINAL HEARING AS USUAL.  THEN OUR RK SINGH PRAYED FOR FIXING THE CASE FOR FINAL DECISION ON 3RD OR 10TH FEBRUARY BUT ON 3RD FEBRUARY THE COURT WAS LIKELY TO BE BUSY IN CONSTITUTION AND ON10TH FEBRUARY AS USUAL THE ADVOCATE GENERAL SAID TO BE BUSY ELSEWHERE AS ALSO ON 23RD FEBRUARY. OUR RK SINGH OPPOSED AND SAID THAT IT IS A PLOY OF LIC TO TAKE TIME IN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER FOR THE LAST ABOUT ONE AND HALF YEAR AND HAS SAID THAT IN CASE THE PRESENT SENIOR ADVOCATE DOES NOT HAVE TIME LIC SHOULD ENGAGE SOME OTHER ADVOCATE THERE IS NO DEARTH OF THEM OR ELSE COST MAY BE IMPOSED. 

ULTIMATELY THE COURT WAS PLEASED TO ORDER FOR FIXING THE CASE ON 10TH MARCH,2016 AT NUMBER ONE.

I WAS SAYING THAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE FRUITLESS SINCE THE COURT DECIDES INTERIM APPLICATIONS ALONG WITH FINAL HEARING BUT MR MSM AND MORE THAN HIM HIS BHAKT BR MEHTA WERE POSING MUCH ADO FOR NOTHING AND WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT I WAS SAYING. ALL THESE MENTIONS AND MENTIONS BOASTED HAVE GONE WASTE. HOWEVEER, IT CAN BE USED TO CONFUSE AND MISLEAD THE PENSIONERS.

HE HAS IN ONE OF HIS MESSAGE SAID THAT I HAVE NOT TAKEN ANY ACTION IN THIS DIRECTION BUT I SAY THAT I HAD FILED APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF AIRIEF FOR IMPLEADMENT IN THE MONTH OF MARCH 2014. THIS IS ON JOLT TO HIS ALLEGATION AGAINST ME AND SHOWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE WELFARE OF THE PENSIONERS.BUT ONLY IN MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ME. I WILL RESPOND TO HIS OTHER ALLEGATIONS.

I MAY SAY THAT THIS APPLICATION WAS A FUTILE EFFORT JUST TO GAIN PUBLICITY. THE DELHI HC WRIT WAS FOR DR TO CLASS I ONLY AND NOT FOR REVISION OF PENSIONS WHILE THE JAIPUR WRITS ARE FOR FOR BOTH ONE FOR DR ANOMALY AND THE OTHER FOR PENSION REVISION AS AND WHEN PAY SCALES ARE REVISED AND THAT IS COVERING ALL THE CLASSES, I, II, III AND IV. BUT THE EGO OF SOME DOES NOT LEAVE THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE RETIRED AND COME IN CLASS V.

WITH BEST WISHES,

KML ASTHANA
29/1/216