* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

Sunday, December 06, 2015

SHRI KML ASTHANA WRITES



IT APPEARS THAT THESE PERSONS (CRITICS) ARE NOT AWARE OF THE PROCEDURE IN THE COURT. WHEN FATHER OF THE SR ADVOCATE WAS TO BE OPERATED UPON STILL HE CAME TO THE COURT AND REQUESTED THE COURT TO TAKE THE SAME AT THE INITIAL STAGE SO THAT AFTER SHORT HEARING WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE DONE CAN BE COMPLETED AND HE CAN ATTEND TO HIS FATHER BUT THE COURT DOES NOT CHANGE THE STATUS. HENCE THE COURT SAID THAT THEY WILL ADJOURN THE CASE WHEN ITS NUMBER COMES. AND HE SHOULD GO AND ATTEND THE CASE. 


MR PP DHAMIJA MAY BE IN THE COURT BUT AT A DISTANCE AND HE COULD NOT HAVE HEARD THE MENTION AND REPLY. AS MR DHAMIJA SAYS THAT AT 12.30 THE CASE NO. 101 NATURALLY IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN TAKEN UP BEFORE LUNCH. ONE MUST APPRECIATE THAT IN CASE HE HIMSELF WAS TO BE OPERATED AND HIS SON DOES NOT COME WHAT WILL BE HIS FEELING. 

ONE MUST BE GOVERNED BY HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS AT LEAST WE TAKE THEM INTO CONSIDERATION MAYBE BRM, PPDHAMIJA MAY NOT. THERE ARE ALLEGATIONS THAT ON TWO DATES OUR SR ADVOCATE WAS NOT PRESENT IN THE COURT BUT NEVER ADJOURNMENT WAS DONE. ONE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE ADVOCATES IN ALL THE COURTS HAVE TO CONDUCT SEVERAL CASES IN A DAY AND THE COURTS ALSO PASS OVER THE CASE SO THAT THE ADVOCATE MAY COME. IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE WHETHER MR GUPTA WAS NOT THERE. EVEN OTHERWISE WE ARE THE RESPONDENTS AND HAVE TO ONLY REPLY AND REBUT THE ARGUMENTS OF THE APPELLANTS AFTER THEY ARE COMPLETED AND FOR THAT OUR ADVOCATE RK SINGH WAS THERE TO APPRISE SHRI GUPTA WHEN HIS NUMBER WOULD COME BUT ON ALL THOSE DATES EVEN MR GUPTA WAS PRESENT AND FOR SOMETIME HE HAD GONE WHEN THE NUMBER OF HIS ANOTHER CASE HAD COME AND IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER HE HAD COME. 

THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT AWARE OF THE PROCEDURE, WE COULD NOT HAVE ENGAGED AND DETAINED A LAWYER, THEN IN THAT CASE WE HAVE TO PAY SPECIAL FEES BUT IN OUR CASE WE ARE PAYING FOR THE DATES ANY PROCEEDINGS TAKES PLACE OTHERWISE NOT. ONE MUST UNDERSTAND THE SITUATIONS BUT THESE PERSONS ARE ONLY MOTIVATED BY THE IDEA OF MAKING COMMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE SITTING ON THEIR COMFORT ITEMS AND HAVE NO BUSINESS OTHER THAN MAKING COMMENTS.CAN THOSE PERSONS TELL ME IF THEY HAD BEEN ON THE OPERATION TABLE AND THEIR SON OR FAMILY MEMBERS DO NOT COME THEY WOULD ALLOW THIS WITH PLEASURE AS THEY ARE COMMENTING NOW?
KML ASTHANA