* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Friday, August 15, 2014

Ex-gratia increase to old pensioners - SC unlikely to list our case for a month, be happy if earlier date given, says SRIDHARAN.

I DAY GREETINGS !

We greet all pensioners and their families on this great day of national significance. On this occasion, I thought of conveying some cheerful news, and I am sure our pensioners will be happy to note the trend.

Hike in ex-gratia: It has been reliably learnt that the CO by their Circular dated 9/8/2014 have announced an increase in ex-gratia for old retirees from Rs.300/ to Rs.350/-p m plus D A.w e f 1/7/2014. Their spouses will get Rs.175/-plus DA. The increase is no doubt very marginal but this is definitely a step forward. It is gratifying that one of our priority demands in favour of elderly pensioners has been met with, though marginal. It is fervently hoped that the rest will follow soon.

GN Sridharan
Gen Secy, Fedn. of Retd. LIC
Class I Officers' Assns

Jest a while !


Thursday, August 14, 2014

More IAs more complications.

I am a man who believes in not complicating the matter during the final hearing of the 3 CAs in the
Courtesy: BR Mehta
supreme court on or about 19th Aug. Persons who earlier demanded withdrawal of all IAs and make a united plea have themselves filed an IA. More the IAs the merrier are LIC advocates. I am not sure whether more IAs, presently 5,  will help? Only our leaders can shed light.

I personally feel allowing each of the 3 stake holders to plea for implementation of their respective HCs judgements without interfering in the others is the best course if an united approach is not possible.

In any case it is good for us to know what the IA 5 contains as desired by Sri K.S. Raman.
As of now most of us have no inkling of what the marathon hundred pages of LIC's plea contain.
In these matters there appears to be no transparency..

T SAMPATH IYENGAR
BANGALORE

Why government was unable to push through the insurance bill in Rajya Sabha‏


Earlier in the week the government was unable to push through the insurance bill in the Rajya Sabha. Here's why:Why government was unable to push   through the insurance bill in Rajya SabhaWhy government was unable to push through the insurance bill in Rajya Sabha
War of the Houses
In case of a deadlock in non-money bills, a joint session of the two houses can be called. However, there is no provision of a joint session in case of a deadlock for a constitutional amendment
A joint sitting can be summoned by the President of India and is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha
60 bills are pending in the Rajya Sabha 
Why government was unable to push through the insurance bill in Rajya SabhaWhy government was unable to push through the insurance bill in Rajya Sabha
68 bills introduced in the last Lok Sabha have lapsed
There have been three joint sessions in the past to resolve deadlocks between the two houses of parliament:
May 6 and 9, 1961, on the Dowry Prohibition Bill, 1959
May 17, 1978, on the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill, 1977
March 26, 2002, on the Prevention of Terrorism Bill, 2002
(Source: rajyasabha.nic.in)
Courtesy: RK Sahni

M Sreenivasa Murty

(Parleys a must, lest pensioners 
may accuse we could not come 
together and oppose LIC and UOI 
atleast now. -Ed.)
Dear All,

I reproduce *below an Appeal I posted in the Pensioners' Chronicle.

I now renew my Appeal personally through this mail specially to the two stalwarts viz., KML & GNS who have a major role to play in the coming days, as the drama unfolds in Supreme Court.

Friends, let's meet in a pleasant environment, exchange notes, evaluate options, anticipate what may or may not happen when the matters are taken up by the Bench, what stand LIC & UoI are likely to take etc.,

Let's prepare for ALL contingencies and try to ensure that we extract even from an unwilling LIC what we are entitled to, through the Apex Court. Today's mood of the Judiciary against the Government, is too well known.  Plus, our own case and the cause, not to talk of the tremendous advantage on account of the favorable judicial verdicts, you gentlemen have secured - are in my view, a once in lifetime chance to clinch things in favor of the LIC Pensioners.

Let's put our heads and hearts together, and enter the Court Hall confidently.

*Post already published.
UNION BANK RETIRED EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION

Delegation to DY. Governor, RBI -
for up-dation of pension in RBI

    We forward herewith an e-mail and its attachment. 

Yours sincerely,
B.G.Raithatha,
General Secretary

Meeting With Shri S.C. Mundra, Dy. Governor
A delegation of the Association consisting of S/Shri R.P. Donde, T.G. Nair, M.B. Talekar, A.P. Kale, T.P. Kunhiraman and L.R. Parab called on the newly appointed Deputy Governor, Shri S.C. Mundra, who is also in charge of HRMD, and welcomed him with a bouquet on 8th August 2014.  The delegation wished him happy and successful tenure in the Bank. Office-bearers recalled that the D.G., who was CMD of a nationalized bank and also the Chairman of IBA, had vast experience of the problems of retirees in the banking sector. Reserve Bank had over19,000 retirees, which number exceeded the total working staff of the Bank. Referring to the issue of updation of pension in the Bank we stated that it has pending for long in spite of sincere follow-up by three successive Governors, including the present one, viz. Dr. Raghuram G. Rajan with the Finance Ministry. Our Association and also the Forum of R.B. Officers and Employees are vigorously pursuing the matter.  Governor had informed the delegation of our Chennai unit on the recent occasion of the Governor’s felicitation function that the Bank was engaged in getting a fair deal from the Government and the finality was expected shortly. D.G. was requested to ensure that the issue is settled without further delay as the entire retiree community of the Bank is anxiously waiting for updation of pension. D.G. who appeared to be well acquainted with the case, gave us patient hearing.   He is expected to do the needful in the matter.
The issue of opening of option for pension was also raised. D.G. stated that it was interlinked with updation of pension.

SN (a 1992 pensioner)


LIC Pensioners have been very anxiously awaiting for last many months for the Supreme Court's final judgement. The judgement, hopefully in favour of pensioners, would be pronounced shortly.  


D.S.Nakara & others/Union of India is a landmark judgement (1982) in Pensioners' history. The Apex Court has held more than thirty year ago that the pensioners are a homogenous class and dividing them is unconstitutional. The new rate of pension - revised pension under the liberalised pension scheme should be made applicable to all pensioners irrespective of dates of their retirement. The judgement  reportedly has been referred to in all pension related court cases. The judgement has also been extensively quoted by the the Fifth Central Pay Commissions in its recommendations for updating of pension to all the pensioners including the pre and the post 1986 pensioners and family pensioners on notional basis. The pensioners and family pensioners got arrears from 01-01-1996. The Sixth CPC has given much more. It is worthwhile to recapitulate the Concept of Social Justice and the concluding and operative part of the judgement ( only the portion/ part of judgement relevant to LIC Pensioners cases- furnished below - reproduced from the Net ) on the eve of the judgement of the Supreme Court on the LIC Pensioners petitions.

Concept of Social Justice : " D. S. Nakara & others v. Union of India, the Supreme Court has held that the principal aim of a socialist state is to eliminate inequality in income, status and standards of life. The basic frame work of socialism is to provide a proper standard of life to the people, especially, security from cradle to grave. Amongst there, it envisaged economic equality and equitable distribution of income. This is a blend of Marxism & Gandhism, leaning heavily on Gandhian socialism. From a wholly feudal exploited slave society to a vibrant, throbbing socialist welfare society reveals a long march, but, during this journey, every state action, whenever taken, must be so directed and interpreted so as to take the society one step towards the goal."

The concluding and operative part of the Judgement :
" That is the end of the journey, with the expanding horizons of socio-economic justice, the Socialist Republic and Welfare State which we endeavour to set upon and largely influenced by the fact that the old men who retired when emoluments were comparatively low and are exposed to vagaries of continuously rising prices, the falling value of the rupee consequent upon inflationary inputs, we are satisfied that by introducing an arbitrary eligibility criteria : 'being in service and retiring subsequent to the specified date' for being eligible for the liberalised pension scheme and thereby dividing a homogeneous class, the classification being not based on any discernible rational principle and having been found wholly unrelated to the objects sought to be achieved by grant of liberalised pension and the eligibility criteria devised being thoroughly arbitrary, we are of the view that the eligibility for liberalised pension scheme of 'being in service in the specified date and retiring subsequent to that date' in impugned memoranda, Exhibits P-1 and P-2, violates Art. 14 and is unconstitutional and is struck down. Both the memoranda shall be enforced and implemented as read shown as under : In other words, in Exhibit P-1, the word :That in respect of the Government servants who are in service of the 31st March, 1979 and retiring from service on or after that date" and in Ex. P-2, the words :" the new rates of pension are effective from 1st April, 1979 and will be applicable to all service officers who became/become non-effective on or after that date." are unconstitutional and are struck down with this specification that the date mentioned therein will be relevant as being one from which the liberalised pension scheme becomes operative to all pensioners governed by 1972 Rules irrespective of the date of retirement. Omitting the unconstitutional part it is declared that all pensioners governed by the 1972 Rules and Army Pension Regulations shall be entitled to pension as computed under the liberalised pension scheme from the specified date, irrespective of the date of retirement."

SN ( a 1992 Pensioner )

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Call for joint strategy !

                               








Mr. MS Murty should be congaratulated for his 

perseverence in his efforts to forge 'unity' among 
those who hve filed cases against LIC.I wish him all 
the best in his efforts. Notwithstanding this effort 
I would like to seek his clarification on as to how he 
expects the officers fedn to join him ,when he failed 
in his efforts to convince GNS, from inside the 
organisation,  when Mr Murthy was a member.

Now having come out of the fedn,my doubt is whether 
GNS and his advocates would oblige him to attend a 
meeting called by MSM. I learn that MSM has filed a 
IA before the SC.Can he provide a copy of the 
same. I am extremely glad that he has a plan for 
every eventuality. 

I wish him all the best. 

K.S. Raman

Let the leaders meet and talk !


Tuesday, August 12, 2014

The anxiety of an 81 year old pensioner


It is not that what I am writing is not known to our legal pundits nor should I be misunderstood for being over anxious. As the D Day is not far away, pensioners in the twilight of their life harbor many doubts in their mind, the foremost being that should the Apex court disposing the tied up cases give a verdict in favor of the petitioners, will LIC as they did in Asthana’s CCP pay the benefits only to the petitioners who contested. Should a situation like this accidentally or otherwise arise in the proceedings when the Bench sits, our learned counsels should take care of the situation.

I stroll into the Delhi HC judgment, the operative part of it says : SLP dismissed on  8-8-2013. So LIC has to give the benefit of the view taken by the Rajasthan HC to ALL PENSIONERS and would treat the decision in rem. There is no stay in the Delhi HC order dated 30-1-2013.

It has to be seen now the Apex court gives the direction with regard to the implementation of their judgment and we hope that this time it will be clear and precise without giving scope for any further clarification. We have waited for long and let there be no more suspense.

Wishing my fellow pensioners best of luck and May God be with them

R.K.viswanathan

SC: No further orders of listing.

Courtesy: LSRK RAO.

FEEDBACK


Good suggestion and nice initiative.
A precious opportunity 
should not be allowed to slip away 
by leaders of the various Federations.


Kind regards.
C H Mahadevan 

M Sreenivasa Murty


What and when next?   

Retired LIC Class I Officers’ Association Hyderabad 
        (Regd No 934 of 2014) files IA No 5 of 2014 before 
               the Hon’ble Supreme Court, with a limited objective.

I personally welcome this breather.  It should help all concerned to think coolly and decide what they can and wish to do to ensure common good for the entire community of beleaguered LIC Pensioners. Or at least decide what NOT TO DO which may 

A) delay the Final Hearing, 
B) give a new lever to LIC to continue its cruel game of procrastination and/or 
C) neutralize the advantage we got from the CAs having been listed for Final 
Hearing and fritter away a valuable opportunity to move forward, for any 
wrong reasons.

I have a crystal clear road map in my mind. Its success depends not on how clear my plan is to me but how acceptable it is to other players. Therefore I have no reservations in sharing, collaborating, or make mid-course modifications. Or completely back off if it helps the Pensioners as a whole. My Association now has a legitimate presence in the on-going proceedings before the Supreme Court.

Here is an open Appeal from the President of the Hyderabad Association: Let representative/s of the two giant Federations and of the Petitioners before P&H HC Chandigarh, converge at Delhi on 17th and 18th August. (And NOT on the eve of the Hearing date or just an hour before the Hearing itself). We can discuss and even agree on a Common Minimum Program. Share it then with our respective Counsel. If it is not possible for all the Counsel to meet or otherwise exchange views, I come to meet your counsel and I will take you to mine – to make sure that the CMP is adhered to.

Let’s leave all acrimony behind. There is no other way of serving the cause of our co-pensioners and helping ourselves.
M.Sreenivasa Murty       

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Brighter days ahead...

"Only option: Pray God to bless our heroes" by Sri BR Mehta, as uploaded in LIC PENSIONERS' CHRONICLE has caused immense pain.He has spoken the words of thousands of old pensioners who are at the fag end of lives.Many have already left this world.Many are waiting on the fence.Sri Mehta's observation make tears rolling down our eyes. 

Yes, some of our leaders are adamant and non-compromising losing sight of the fact that their ego do not carry any value of even a single paisa.This section of leaders, surrounded by some flatters of these leaders' own choice, are blind having lost the sight & wisdom have only one objective of creating division amongst the pensioners based on the dates of retirements.These leaders have no place in the minds of the pensioners and their profusely shedding of crocodile tears will go in vain bearing the only fruit-----the denial of the rightful benefits of 100% neutralisation of DR together with upgradation of pension with every wage revision.  

The truth is with the pensioners, the biggest arm, and the positive verdicts of the three High courts make them even stronger.

Mehtaji, the happenings in the banking sector lead us to look forward.
With profound regards to all pensioners.        
--
Subir Kumar Mazumder

    Dear sir,

    Again wait. Owing to heavy rush, our case appears to be
    shifted from 12 08 2014 to 19 08 2014. How long we have to
    wait is the million dollar question in the minds of hapless LIC
    pensioners who were eagerly waitng for a favourable verdict
    on 12 08 2014. As Sh Metha suggests Sh MSN Murthy's
    opinion should be adhered to by the three petitioners' assons 



    for united fight against LIC to get favourable verdict. Will they do it
    at this juncture?
    Let wisdom prevail.

    A V Subbaraman Coimbatore Division

    "Only option: Pray God to bless our heroes" !

    Latest communication from Sh. Sreenivasa Murty through L.I.C. Pensioners Chronicle tells us that all three civil appeals filed by L.I.C. against verdicts of three high courts namely Jaipur,Chandigarh and Delhi are tagged together but due to heavy rush and other technical issues same is most likely to be listed for 19th August ,2014.

    • All highly intellectuals, senior and experienced L.I.C.Pensioners observing progress of our legal battle in unbiased manner feel that justice to L.I.C.Pensioners Community is being denied by L.I.C.Management under pressure of GOI.
    • However, besides above genuine reason we have one more very valid reason which is total
      lack of unity amongst our so called Heroes fighting the legal battle.
    • Untiring sincere and honest efforts by Sh. Murty have not succeded due to very large ego and vested personal agendas of our Heroes.
    • Need of hour was to engage three very senior advocates at supreme court and One Joint Legal Committee must have been in action to brief said advocates how to win said legal battle. Since our Heroes are not at same platform so it is very difficult to think of Unity at this stage.
    • Fight for credit war does not bring Unity and it appears that our Heroes are fighting with each other through proxy in stead of fighting unitedly against L.I.C.This missing Unity is likely to benefit L.I.C. Management and prolong said legal battle. However, nothing can be done and we are all helpless.

    So the only option left with us is to pray to God to bless our Heroes for welfare of whole community so that we win at the end. Better late than never.

    BR MEHTA, PANCHKULA.

    Waiting for the Godot !

    " Waiting for the Godot " a play by Samuel Becket.
    A few interpretations from the net.
    Humanity waiting for elusive return of a saviour.
    Helplessness of human beings, their lives.
    Every human being must come to terms with if they
    are to take their subjective existence seriously
    and with intrinsic values.



    LIC Pensioners waiting for justice for last twelve 
    plus years. Is the justice unto them all elusive ? 
    Are the Pensioners to get justice in the foreseeable 
    future ?


    Are the Pensioners Waiting for the Godot ? 
    Enough of wait, enough of unreasonable long wait.
    May, the Almighty God intervene for immediate
    deliverance of favourable justice to the Pensioners
    by the Apex Court.

    It was/is beautiful, pleasing, comforting and timely 
    to read ' FAITH ' posted in the PC today, the 
    10-08-2014. Bless He.

    SN ( a 1992 Pensioner )

    Faith !

    Courtesy: RK Sahni

    Saturday, August 09, 2014

    SUPREME COURT CASES - NOT LISTED ON 12TH AUG 2014

    LIC Pensioners' waiting continues.  Our cases are NOT coming up for hearing on 12.08.2014, due to heavy backlog of 'Regular cases'. In the weekly list our cases were at Sl No 49. The final list for 12th included only some. Going by the trend, our cases are not expected on 13th also. 

    • One saving grace is that the Appeals are all tagged together, confirmed for FINAL HEARING. There is fair chance of the matters reaching in the week commencing 18th August 2014.   

    Thanks and regards, M. Sreenivasa Murty

    RuPay cards to replace Aadhaar in welfare scheme authentication‏


    NEW DELHI: The finance ministry has decided to limit Aadhaar's role in its welfare scheme payments and, instead, use ATM-enables RuPay cards for last-mile authentication to withdraw money.
    While it will continue to use Aadhaar for opening accounts and to eliminate ghosts and duplicates from beneficiary rolls, the ministry has decided to give RuPay ATM cards with bank accounts being opened under to-be-announced financial inclusion drive, Sampoorn Vittiyea Samaveshan, government officials told ET .


    Government welfare payments were seen as one of the biggest potential revenue streams for Aadhaar. Vijay Madan, director general at UIDAI, did not respond to an ET email about the impacts of this development as of press time. Puneet Chopra, associate director at Lucknow-based financial inclusion think-tank Microsave, said, "Selection of RuPay card means authentication will be PIN based."


    We do not want that an account holder should be restricted on a particular technology platform. By providing RuPay powered ATM card the account holder can transact on multiple platforms," a senior finance ministry official said on the condition of anonymity. This is a large blow to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) which has, till now, regarded authentication services as one of its principal functions.
    Several reports from field have said that online biometric authentication is not working for manual labourers and the old. UIDAI had notified handheld device specifications all business correspondents (BCs) need to follow. This was, however, opposed by BCs using different technologies such as smart card-based biometrics or no biometrics at all.


    Abhishek Sinha, the founder of Eko, a mobile based banking provider, had told ET at that time: "Different villagers might be more comfortable authenticating their identity through a card, a phone, a fingerprint or a numeric code. The network should be able to accommodate all those options, and leave room for innovation."

    Courtesy: RK Sahni

    Seven things people want to know about Income tax scrutiny

    Many individuals, companies and firms, at some point, would have received a notice u/s 143(2) of Income tax Act, often known by the public as “Scrutiny”. People panic when they receive such a notice and a layman often feels as if a search, survey or a raid has been initiated. The following points will help you understand the subject better:

    1. What is Scrutiny?
    Once the assessee files his return of income, irrespective of whether it is filed within the due date or in pursuance to a notice requiring the assessee to file his return, the department can initiate scrutiny proceedings if it has reason to believe that income is escaping assessment, i.e. income is under stated of expenditure is over stated. Therefore, a notice is issued on the assessee asking him to attend the department’s office and produce additional documents if any required. A mere receipt of a notice does not indicate any crime; it simply indicates conducting of investigation to find out

    if any income has escaped assessment. Please understand that scrutiny is a tool used in an on-going assessment proceeding, so where the return per se is not filed, the question of issuing a notice does not arise.

    2. Why is only my case chosen for Scrutiny?
    If your return of income has been made subject to scrutiny, there necessarily has to be a reason for it. For each year, there is a pre-determined criteria that is followed by the department for identifying scrutiny cases. For instance, one of the criteria for financial year 2013-14 was to select cases where an addition in excess of Rs 10 lacs has been made in any of the previous years and which has not been set aside. The list of criteria was previously not accessible by general public however as per the recent High Court order, this information has now been made public and anyone can view it. The department also uses a software specifically designed for this purpose which enables the officer to identify potential tax evasion cases. The output of this software is based on inputs like short term capital gains earned by the assessee, deductions claimed, advance tax paid, etc. The software is intelligent enough to correlate all the data and indicate if anything looks fishy. Apart from cases which are generated out of these pre-determined criteria, there are other instances also where a scrutiny investigation is initiated.

    3. What are the myths pertaining to the subject of Scrutiny?
    There are lot of myths surrounding the topic of scrutiny. People make their own conclusions based on their personal experience. Some myths like filing returns online means higher chances of being subject to scrutiny or buying an expensive car will draw the attention of department are completely baseless. It is true that if you are declaring very low income as against an unreasonably high expenditure, it naturally indicates that the expenses are being funded through other sources of income that are not otherwise declared. But take example of a farmer who is filing return of income each year for say Rs 4,50,000 only and in one particular year he sells a large piece of land for which he declares a gain of Rs 2 crore. In this case, even if he buys 5 cars in the same financial year, there is a clear source of income for the expenses made and should proper disclosure be made it would be incorrect to assume that merely because cars are purchased, the case could be subject to scrutiny.

    On a technical side, one of the biggest myths which even Professional & qualified Accountants have is that the time limit for issuing notice is to be counted from the end of the relevant assessment year. This will not hold true where the filing of return of income itself is delayed as the computation of validity is to be counted from the end of the year in which return was filed and not from the end of the relevant assessment year.


    4. What is the time limit for receiving the notice?
    If 6 months have elapsed since the end of the financial year in which the return was filed, then a notice for scrutiny cannot be served upon the assessee. For instance, for the financial year ending 2013-14, assuming return of income is duly filed; notice cannot be served under whatsoever circumstances after 30th September, 2015. It is advisable that the assessee should always retain a copy of the sealed envelope which indicates the “date of receipt” of the notice. This helps in assessing the constitutional validity of the notice.

    It may sound surprising but the fact is that if you do not raise an objection for being served a delayed notice, and at a later point of time, out of the blue, if you are bringing this to the attention of the tax officers, then there is a clear provision in the Act which says that your objection shall be rejected as you are deemed to have accepted the notice. So, before proceeding any step further, you must first check the date of notice in order to confirm its legality.



    5. Are all inquiry notices received from department a subject matter of Scrutiny?
    The department makes inquiry in pursuance to the return filed by you. As against the notice pertaining to “scrutiny” which generally requires the assessee to be produced before the department along with an exhaustive list of documents, a notice u/s 142(1) is a simple inquiry in order to complete the assessment wherein certain missing information or clarifications are sought for. Such notices are often confused by assessees as if a scrutiny has been initiated which although is not the case. In fact, most people would receive a notice u/s 142(1) and there is nothing prima facie to bother about it. Over and above these, there are other enquiry notices which are being served but on a very case by case basis.

    6. What to do when a Scrutiny notice is received?
    If you have received a notice from the department u/s 143(2) asking for additional information, you must co-operate. The notice generally requires the assessee to produce an exhaustive set of documents, like details of bank accounts, gifts made and received, copies of credit card statements, details of foreign travel and the source of expenditure, details on club membership and annual subscriptions, along with personally producing himself in front of the officer. If you feel that you do not have all the documents ready that have been asked for submission, you must convey properly to the department. Presence of a Chartered Accountant or any other professional can make the process efficient to a great extent.


    7. What if I don’t respond or co-operate to a Scrutiny notice?Failure to co-operate leads to completion of assessment on a “Best Judgment” basis, which means that the department can confirm the assessment and finalize your income and tax liability thereon as they deem fit, on the basis of information available to them. The assessee is given an opportunity of being heard but which generally becomes redundant for not choosing to answer the questions earlier posed. Apart from being fined on failure to respond, there is a possibility that your failure will lead to suspicion in the eyes of the department and such suspicions can be followed by initiation of a more detailed & painful investigation called “Survey”.
    [Author is associated with R. K. Doshi & Co., Chartered Accountants, and can be contacted for any queries or comments on utsav@rkdoshi.com]
    - See more at: http://taxguru.in/income-tax/7-people-incometax-scrutiny.html#sthash.HhjRpe8o.dpuf

    Courtesy: RK Sahni
     

    Friday, August 08, 2014

    A Pensioner's observation

    This refers to Sreenivasa Murty’s ‘Let us be vigilant’. On 12 TH AUGUST we hope that the nagging adjournments and the annoying suspense will come to an end. To have this happen one should not be caught napping and there should a fusion of legal brain with one point agenda to get justice then and there on 12 TH AUGUST. 


    There is no dearth of intellectual acumen with the LIC folks, some of them having served in the legal department during their service and some of them now practicing in the bar. With the favorable verdicts we got in various courts the final verdict we expect from the Apex court will be icing on the cake. But the vagaries of our judicial system is such that sometimes the unexpected happen much to our astonishment. 

    We should be fully prepared and in advance there should be adequate counseling with the advocates to stall any move by the appellant for any more adjournments or for bringing a new issue for adjudication although there could be no such issue in existence to be brought now. 

    The present government is for less government and for more governance and as declared by them they are averse to tinker into the autonomy of statutory and autonomous Corporations and with this policy it may not dictate to LIC in court matters and the various timely memorandums submitted by pensioners individually and through their representative bodies should influence the attitude of the government in not interfering in the court matters and to find a solution quickly should justice be on the petitioner’s side.

    Armed we are with a double barrel gun but our target should be the same, to hit the bull’s eye, removal of DR anomaly and updation of pension. Let us not miss the target.


    R.K.Viswanathan

    Dearness Relief Factor (DRF)

    Pensioners can work out the amount of increase in the dearness relief with reference to
    their Dearness Relief Factor (DRF) once they come to know the increase in the Number of Slabs.
    Half yearly increase in number of slabs ( based on AICPI-IW ) is invariably published in the LIC Pensioners Chronicle on the last day of December and July or latest by in the first week of January and July. A few others including the Indian Banks Association also do publish the increase / decrease in the slabs in respect of serving bank employees and pensioners.
    Pensioners, who do not know (not been advised by office) the DRF, may work out their DRF
    based on the component of Dearness Relief out of the total pension divided by the Total Number of slabs applicable to relevant pay scale. 


    An example: Shri SRK retired as AAO on 30-06-2014 at the maximum of pay scales (no stagnation increment etc) in the pay scale applicable to 01-08-2007. His basic pension is fixed at Rs.16320/- and he received his first pension for the month of July 2014. The total pension credited to his bank account included dearness relief of Rs.15642.72 . Total number of slabs for February to July was 639 ( for 2007 pay scales ).Shri SRK's DRF is ____ Rs.15642.72 / 639 slabs. = 24.4801.
    DR increase for August 2014 to January 2015 is 17 slabs.
    DR increase works out to DRF x Increase in Number of Slabs. : 24.4801 x 17 = Rs.416.16
    Total DR for August 2014 shall be.....Rs15642.72 + Rs.416.16 = Rs.16058.88 or Rs.16059.00.
    [ The amount should be rounded of to next rupee ; even 0.01 is rounded of to Re.1.00 in case of GOI and RBI pensioners and family pensioners . DRF works well, at times, with difference of fraction of a rupee because of rounding off to next rupee ]

    Please also see below :
    Dearness Relief Factor of Assistant Accounts Officer retired on different dates-in different
    Pay Scales.
    @ Courtesy: CHM,  # Courtesy: RKS
    SN (A 1992 PENSIONER)

    SRIDHARAN'S IA APPEARS TO BE INNOCUOUS

    In continuation of my writing on 2-8-14 in connection with the split of Class I retired Officers Association, Hyderabad Unit requesting to enlighten your readers with the prayer of GNS in S.C. in IA 3, I came across circular issued by GNS on 28-7-14 where in the final prayer in IA 3 which reads:
    • ''Direct the LIC to pay to the applicants or alternately deposit within a stipulated time amounts due to the members of the applicant federation as deposited in the case of the petitioners who had approached the the Rajasthan HC and in view of the fact that the Hon'ble Court has declined to grant stay of the order dated 30-1-2013 of the Delhi High Court"
    • Further states " it will be observed that the above prayer does not in any way come into conflict with the order of Rajasthan High Court. It is also to be added that the prayer was worded by our counsels to keep the matter simple and not to give room for LIC to make unnecessary points in their counter and delay the matter."
    The IA 3 of GNS appears to be innocuous and should not have been the sole ground for causing the split.

    When all the 3 HC judgments are bunched and stated for Final Hearing in SC on 12-8-2014 I do not know how the SC deals with them. I do not know IA 3 will be taken up first and whether the 3 judgements would be dealt individually.

    As a pre 8/97 retiree I will not be unhappy if the SC upholds the Delhi HC judgement and pass suitable order on upgradation of pension. Seen with the trend of introducing New Pension Scheme to Central Govt. employees and Banks from a prospective date I wonder what plea LIC will make during the arguments on up-gradation of pension to us.

    T SAMPATH IYENGAR, BANGALORE

    'Safe List' Incometax "Donot" reply mail

    NEW DELHI: After asking taxpayers to validate their personal email ids and mobile phone numbers for online filing of Income Tax returns, the I-T department has now urged them to include its official email address in the 'safe list' of their inboxes.

    The department has suggested taxpayers to validate and include in the 'white/ safe list' of their respective inboxes the official handle of the department -- '
    DONOTREPLY@incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in', so that it does not land in the spam or junk folder of the tax payer.

    Thursday, August 07, 2014

    SC case

    Dear Sir,
    
    Our case is being listed for final hearing (MS Murty's post) 
    on 12 08 2014. Our leaders may take note of Shri Murty's
    opinion also and act.

    
    
    A V Subbaraman Coimbatore Division

    Tools in your PC to help you read better.


    We browse through numerous sites and come across many useful articles which we unfortunately skip for want of patience and time and they get buried in the ‘Trash’ in your PC. 

    WWW.Readability.com a web site which offers a cluster free interface and helps you in offline reading of articles. It also offers you a list of popular articles which users around the world are reading. For instance I stumbled upon an article “ Secrets of a creative brain” “ Where genius comes from and why it is often accompanied by mental illness “. Using this web site you can read such articles at your leisure. However I warn you that you need to show interest in reading such articles and have the patience too.

    So why wait. Open the web site and get going. After all we the pensioners need to spend time rather than hibernating.

    R.K.Viswanathan

    Wednesday, August 06, 2014

    LIC PENSIONERS - THEIR FATE TO BE DECIDED BY THE APEX COURT SHORTLY.

    M.SREENIVASA MURTY

    As on today, NONE of LIC's Appeals find a place in the Advance Cause list of Supreme Court, for the week commencing on 11.08.2014.
    • However, a regular list is expected (as a supplementary) to be released by late evening of Friday the 8th Aug 2014 which should include ALL the three CAs filed by LIC.
    • SC Registry has acted upon the written request of Shri Jay Savla, Advocate retained by the Petitioners in P&H HC at Chandigarh (to appose CA No 6995 of 2013 filed by LIC) to "tag all Appeals and post them together" in compliance with SC proceedings dated 4.4.2014.
    • The listing as expected for 12th August 2014, is technically for "FINAL HEARING". When matters are listed for for Final Hearing, no IA may be taken up by SC for any of the so called interim relief. 
    This should be welcome to all Pensioners and Petitioners while it may not be so to LIC.

    It is most important that all leaders representing the Pensioner-Petitioners before Rajasthan, Delhi and Chandigarh High Courts, sink all their differences and oppose any moves by LIC to delay the final hearing, by following a cohesive strategy beneficial to ALL CATEGORIES of LIC Pensioners.

    Any shortsighted approach or wrong move can cause immense damage to the pensioner community as a whole.
    • Briefing the Counsel and make sure that they acquire complete command on full 'facts' of the cases is the responsibility of the leaders and it is the normal duty of all affected pensioners to ensure that the leaders do not falter at the crucial moment. 

    Calculation of rate of DA per slab

    (Shri Sahni has revised his earlier DR calculation details as below.Ed.)

    The rate of DA/DR per slab of 4 points of AICPI-IW base 1960=100 on Basic Pension

    (1) In respect of Class III &IV employees who Retired up to 
    31.07.1992 and Class I & II Officers who retired up to 31.03.1993.
    (i) up to Rs 1250 @ 0.67 %
    (ii) on next Rs 750 @ 0.55 %
    (iii) on next Rs 130 @ 0.33 %
    (iv) on excess over Rs 2130 @ 0.17 %
    for each slab of 4 points over 600 points AICPI-IW
    Current slabs as on 01.08.2014 are 1242

    (2) Class III & IV employees who Retired between 
    01.08.1992 & 31.07.1997 and Class
    I & II Officers who retired between 01.04.1993 & 31.07.1997.
    (i) up to Rs 2400 @ 0.35 %
    (ii) on next Rs 1450 @ 0.29 %
    (iii)on next Rs 250 @0.17 %
    (iv) on excess over Rs 4100 @ 0.09 %
    for each slab of 4 points over 1148 points AICPI-IW
    Current slabs as on 01.08.2014 are 1105

    (3) Employees who retired between 01.08.1997 
    and 31.07.2002 @ 0.23 % of basic pension
    for each slab of 4 points over 1740 points AICPI-IW
    Current slabs as on 01.08.2014 are 957
     
    (4) Employees who retired between 01.08.2002 
    and 31.07.2007
    @ 0.18 % of basic pension
    for each slab of 4 points over 2328 points AICPI-IW
    Current slabs as on 01.08.2014 are 810

    (5) Employees who retired from 01.08.2007 
    onwards @ 0.15 % of basic pension
    for each 4 points over 2944 points AICPI-IW
    Current slabs as on 01.08.2014 are 656.
    The above slabs are calculated at AICPI-IW
    5568.
     
    One can easily calculate the rate of DA/DR per slab on Full Basic 
    Pension (before commutation) on the above basis and arrive 
     
    at the total DA payable by multiplying the rate of DA per slab 
    with the number of slabs.

    Tuesday, August 05, 2014