* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

Some Comments About 'Anonymous' Views


6 Jul 16, 11:59 AM

karunakaran: The anonymous writer has not gone through the SC verdict that Pension Revision and Salary Revision are inseparable. So if the CCS provisions are misguiding, SC verdicts will show the way.

6 Jul 16, 02:26 PM

Perumalmaruthu: Mr Anonymous...any Law or its Clause or Regulation should be interpreted not only in letter but in its true spirit! What was the need of incorporating Clause 56 if it is not for improvements?

6 Jul 16, 03:16 PM

JM Aboobucker: I think Mr. Anonymous has raised a very pertinent question about our Pension Rule 56. When CCS rules do NOT provide for Pension Revision what purpose will be served to quote that Rule.  Everybody knows that CG Pensions are revised after wage revision is given to serving CG Employees. As Mr. Anonymous says the GOI has got some ulterior motive for NOT amending CCS Pension Rules, could Mr AS Ramanathan who is very thorough with these rules throw some light in the matter.