* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Our Delhi HC case


30 Jul 16, 04:10 PM

JM Aboobucker: Mr Namdev's statement that SC was not interested in deciding about violation of FR. The correct position is our Counsels have failed to convince the judges on this vital issue And hence our case was dismissed. It is our failure. At least in the DHC our Counsels should not repeat their performance in the SC. Sufficient preparations are required for an effective presentation of Case to the Judges of DHC and win our case. Let us wait with bated breath for the coming 4th.

30 Jul 16, 05:05 PM

namdev: with respect to shri jma's views, i still feel that justice misra was interested to give judgment on that day itself, without giving any time to our counsels of 4 case managers giving few minutes  ie less than giving dictation of orders. having set aside all previous judgments on the plea of insufficient pleadings in all the 3 hcs and wanted to hear ab initio by delhi hc which is not the duty of sc. i think that is why shri rbk thought delhi hc will forward its judgement to sc for final orders. i don't know his present thoughts. my presumption is we have to ask for a constitution bench for final victory, as it involves whole financial sector and a lot of pressure from goi unless the latter want to decide politically just like 7th cpc from aug'16. i think rbi gov himself is not able to convince our fm even though he gave some hope. we should have patience having waited two decades to have. all is well that ends well.