29 Jul 16, 10:02 PM
B.R.Mehta: Reference your chat column report on the issue AIRIEF Control of Court Cases on your blog just today. It is crystal clear now that Sh. KML Asthana did not want AIRIEF to be a petitioner at DHC. But Sh. Asthana could not stop it and it is a fact now that AIRIEF is one of total six petitioners at DHC. Pl note its fall outs. Senior Counsel Sh. Nidhesh Gupta told the bench at DHC on 12th July that he is appearing on behalf of AIRIEF. How this new scene can be digested by Sh Asthana and hence staying away from court proceedings is the only option for him which he availed on last hearing.
29 Jul 16, 10:40 PM
Sdsarma: It is good that Airief has taken control and kmla is out. Modest Gupta represents only Airief and not Jaipur petitioners. No petition dismissed as withdrawn (as happened in Jaipur).
30 Jul 16, 08:03 AM
namdev: even if there is no unity of thinking between shri kmla and airief, we need not bother, as it is a baby talk in the appraisal of shri chhabra. Shri Chhabra also endorsed my views of political parties of which i have written a lot in the chat column some time back. all those who are abusing shri kmla day and night for real or imaginary reasons have entered the case arena recently compared to long fight by shri kmla, but for him the case would not be in light even though all the positive judgments have been set aside and remanded back to delhi hc ab initio. we are back to square one, that is why hon.justice raised a question of viability. he has not confined to constitutional points. even sc is not interested in deciding our fundamental rights. only saving grace is i.r. whether it is 20% or 40%. i earnestly request all veterans to ponder deep into the case, rather than talking and writing superficially.