* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

M.Sreenivasa Murty



KML never answered my straight and simple questions. But I will answer each of his questions as below: 


IT IS A TOTALLY FALSE STATEMENT TO SAVE HIS FACE AND MISDEEDS COMMITTED SO FAR IN THE WAY OF SUCCESS. HE HAS TO EXPLAIN- 

I made several statements in my Post (Part 2) exposing KML’s bungling of the legal fight. I stick to my charge that he is a compulsive liar and a ‘case wrecker’ in the words of his Federation’s senior co-functionary. 

KML should address them point by point, instead of escaping with sweeping and vague remarks. I committed no misdeeds and so my face is safe. 

WHERE HE WAS WHEN HE RETIRED, I was in Hyderabad doing the post-retirement Training job which I liked and enjoyed (for eight years). I worked hard to earn money. Did not choose any fund collection ‘business’. 

WHETHER HE DID NOT KNOW THE ANOMALIES FOR WHICH HE IS FIGHTING NOW AFTER KMLA HAD WON ALL THE BATTLES IN THE HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR IN THE MATTER OF ANOMALIES IN DA/DR, REVISION OF PAY SCALES FROM TIME TO TIME, 

No, I did not know anything of what and how KMLA was fighting for. I was too busy otherwise. But I was admiring his efforts from a distance. That is why in spite of a ban by GNS Federation (of which I was a member) I too contributed some money to KML’s personal account. I can retrieve proof if he disputes. 

WHERE HIS LEGAL WISDOM HAD GONE, 

My Legal wisdom was safe with me. It did not go anywhere. Then and now. It is more useful to me and LIC pensioners now than before. 

I WON THE TWO WRIT PETITIONS AND THEN SPECIAL APPEALS AND THEN THE FIRST SLP OF 2011 IN THE SC AND THEN THE REVIEW PETITIONS AND THEREAFTER SLPS OF LIC OF THE YEAR 2011 

Absolutely correct. I acknowledged it publicly many a time. But the success he tasted till then, together with the name, fame, followers and the flood of funds received (collected) literally reached his head and KMLA became arrogance personified. Also his success spree ended with that phase. He was a fish in the small Jaipur Pond. Once he left Rajasthan, Delhi did not treat him well. It was a rough weather without break. The phases to follow were non-stop failures for him. His handling of the contempt matter in Supreme Court and in Jaipur HC, were examples of his mishandling the subsequent legal battle and his focus shifted to money making, based on past laurels.

AND NOW WHEN THE SLP OF 2013 IS AT THE FINAL STAGE THIS GREAT MAN HAS COME ON THE SURFACE.

No, not true. I stepped in and visited Delhi to assist him soon after the SLPs were admitted. The CAs then were nowhere near Final Hearing. I goaded him (and succeeded, thanks to Sri RBK) to oppose GNS Federation’s IA No 4 of 2014. He and RK Singh did not do the Registry follow up effectively. But due to a chance development in the Court on 4 April 2014, (LIC Counsel’s over enthusiastic strategy boomeranged) the Bench kept the IAs in cold storage and ordered all CAs to be clubbed together and posted for Final Hearing in the 2nd week of Aug 2014. There was no effort of GNS or KML in that mini-miracle. What KML did thereafter was only to block the Final Hearing with all cock and bull stories, while money continued to pour in, for the AIRIEF as well as his own fat private fund, the latter due to a high pitch campaign by the Mohali Astrologer and some others.



EVEN CHANDIGARH AND DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED ON THE BASIS OF JAIPUR JUDGMENT, WHERE HE WAS THEN?

This is a layman’s view, not of a veteran which KML claims to be. What was Jaipur Judgement based on? Thin air?

WHETHER HE IS FIGHTING WITH KMLA OR WITH LIC?

Both. With LIC because it is denying what is due to its Pensioners, And with KML for the last one and half years because he is acting crazy and bungling the case due to his arrogance and absence of accountability. Because he was never willing to work together with other stakeholders.

WHETHER IF KMLA WILL LEAVE THE CASE IT WILL BE HIS VICTORY AGAINST LIC?

No. But he should not describe himself as indispensable. That amounts to blackmailing. He attempted it successfully with his own AIRIEF so far. My victory is independent of his pursuing his case transparently or choosing to drown all the thousands of Pensioners, who contributed to him and the AIRIEF.

WHETHER ANY USEFUL BENEFIT WILL BE GAINED WHEN AN UNSUCCESSFUL CRUSADER LIKE THE ONE TAKES OVER

I don’t know what he wants to convey in this statement. I cannot take over his case. His AIRIEF itself is at his mercy. How can I do anything? WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW THE FACTS AND LAW OF THE CASE SO FAR This proves his unbridled arrogance. I know full facts of our case and I know some law. I am ready to learn to fill gaps in my knowledge of law. KML’s claim that he knows all law is a joke. My knowledge is a shade better than KML’s and his full time counsel RK Singh’s combined knowledge. 

WHETHER IT IS NOT HE ON ACCOUNT OF HIS WRONG FACTS THE PENSIONER PETITIONERS ARE SUFFERING? 
That exactly is MY complaint against KML (after the cases are out of Jaipur). 

WHY HIS SR ADVOCATE WAS NOT PRESENT AND WHY HE COULD NOT SPEAK ANYTHING BEFORE THE COURT. 

I had the honesty to admit it was a setback in my efforts on that day. I also regretted that it did not occur to me at the right moment that I should have argued the matter myself. One learns by experience. I learnt. But I assure everyone there were no payment issues, (like on 2nd December). 

WHETHER AFTER TAKING OVER THE CASE FROM CHANDIGARH HE HAD RAISED ANY OBJECTION ABOUT THE METHOD OF DEALING WITH THE PENSIONERS IN THE MATTER OF COMPLIANCE OF THE JUDGEMENT IN P&H HIGH COURT? 

Yes I did. Squarely. That is why the contempt matter is still pending in Chandigarh. Neither dismissed nor withdrawn. LIC was forced to reply there through an Affidavit. Which It recently did. Fell in its own trap there. Going to face some music. Let KML not bother about it. Let him focus on what is left in Jaipur, if any and in SC. 

WHETHER THERE WAS ANY BENEFIT TO HIM WHEN HE OBJECTED LIC TO WITHDRAW THE 20% AND GIVE A GROUND NOT TO MAKE PAYMENT OF 20% NOT ONLY ONCE BUT THRICE. WHAT BENEFIT HE GAINED. 

Yes there was benefit. LIC is made to stand before the Court still. Rest is beyond KML’s comprehension. 

KMLA HAD CORRECTLY FILED THE STAY APPLICATIONS AND THAT IS WHY PAYMENT WAS MADE OVERNIGHT TO THE EMPLOYEES. HE DOES NOT KNOW THE CONTENTS OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS BUT IS TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE

Who else is supporting his stay applications in or outside AIRIEF? There are public questions on his move. Let him answer. Alternatively, if employees got their money so quickly because of his stay petition, let him try for donations from the grateful employees, for his wonderful effort. Good chance – why leave? 

BY CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT AND OBJECT OF THE STAY APPLICATIONS. 

What stupid logic is this? When I don’t know the contents as per KML himself, how can I conceal what I don’t even know? 

HE IS DOING SO UNDER THE PRESSURE OF LIC AND AIIPA AND MISGUIDING THE PENSIONERS. 

Under pressure from LIC? Happy he didn’t say LIC paid me a few crores to say so. On AIIPA? I don’t know anybody in it. 

HE IS CONCEALING THE MATERIAL FACT THAT AIRIEF AND KMLA HAD LONG BACK FILED APPLICATIONS IN THE SC FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE APPEALS 

What happened to what you had filed was my question. How much you squeezed from AIRIEF for that is the supplementary question. 

BUT HE HAS NOW FILED ONE AND THAT TOO WITH UTTER FAILURE. 

My application is very much on board and is ultimately going to help LIC Pensioners. 

RATHER IT WAS ON ACCOUNT OF HIS THIS ENDEAVOUR THAT THE FINAL HEARING HAS BEEN DELAYED OTHERWISE THE CASE MAY HAVE BEEN DECIDED IN THE FIRST OR THE SECOND WEEK OF FEBRUARY AS PER THE LIST. WHETHER THIS ACT IS IN THE INTEREST OF PENSIONERS? 

KML talking of somebody else delaying Final Hearing? It is always KML’s monopoly to do so. Coming out with a whitepaper on that shortly. 

WHETHER HIS FIGHT WITH AND ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KMLA WILL GIVE ANY BENEFIT TO THE BENEFITS WHEN KMLA HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL AND HE HAD FAILED/HE SHOULD DESIST FROM MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AND CONTUMACIOUS REMARKS AGAINST KMLA OR AIRIEF INSTEAD CONCENTRATE ON THE LITIGATION WITH LIC IF HE REALLY WANTS THAT THE PENSIONERS GET ANY BENEFIT. AND NO LITIGATION ENSUES BETWEEN THEM 

Repetition – no need to reply again. 

IT IS AIRIEF ALONE WHICH HAS BEEN FIGHTING FOR THE CAUSE OF THE PENSIONERS

Since when did KML start conceding something to AIRIEF? We all know he ia above his Organization. 

AND SUCH PERSONS FOR THEIR ULTERIOR REASONS ARE TRYING TO CREATE HURDLES AND MAKING UNWANTED HUE AND CRY/ 

Let LIC pensioners who feel let down by KML & AIRIEF, judge the issue. 

IT IS ON ACCOUNT OF KMLA FOR THE AIRIEF THAT ALL THE PENSIONERS GOT 3000 AGAINST GOLD COIN, 

Wonderful achievement indeed. I hope KML’s success in that helped some Fund collection then. 

WHEN IT WAS NOT GIVEN, WHERE HE WAS, WHETHER HE COULD NOT CONCEIVE THIS? 

I was nowhere near. Didn’t bother either. And no regrets... 

HE DOES NOT EXIST AT THE MOMENT IN THE ENTIRE LITIGATION AND SUCH TYPE OF ALLEGATIONS WILL NOT GIVE HIM ANY ROAD TO SUCCESS. 

KML may wish I don’t exist. But unfortunately for him, I do. If I don’t exist according to KMLA, what is this entire phobia about? I answered all KML’s questions honestly. Will he ever answer a few of mine?