* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

Monday, September 28, 2015



MURTY WRITES

IN SUPREME COURT TODAY - 
A VERY WELCOME DEVELOPMENT - 
JUSTICE MISRA MAKES HIS MIND KNOWN TO LIC

Dear Sri Gangadharan, 

As per the telephonic information received by me a while ago, LIC once again made a mention today for adjournment of our matters on the ground that the Solicitor General who is retained by LIC to argue its Appeals, is not going to be free tomorrow/ day after. Our Ms Renuka Sahu was present (besides Mr RK Singh).

Justice Misra declined the request firmly and said 'Appear tomorrow/ Day After (meaning whenever the case comes up) and say what you want to. THE JUDGE THEN ADDED ON HIS OWN, "WE WILL REVIEW YOUR COMPLIANCE ON THAT DAY OF OUR ORDER TO PAY 20%". 

That is the news as per my Advocate. 

Some strange version of this development is promptly ( for the first time, so soon?) is circulated by Sri KML. He will never change. God bless him. 

GOOD DAYS ARE AHEAD FOR ALL LIC PENSIONERS. 
M Sreenivasa Murty 

EARLIER ASTHANA WROTE

DEAR ALL,

TODAY ON CALL BEING RECEIVED FROM SHRI PANGARIA AOR OF LIC OUR ADVOCATE SHRI RK SINGH HAD ATTENDED THE SC AT 10.30 AM. AT THAT TIME ONLY JUNIOR ADVOCATE A LADY WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF MR JAY SAVLA. ON MENTION BEING MADE BY THE AOR OF LIC FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE SINCE THE SOLICITOR GENERAL IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PLEAD THE CASE ON THEIR BEHALF OUR MR RK SINGH ADVOCATE VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED THE SAME ON WHICH THE HON'BLE COURT REFUSED TO ADJOURN THE HEARING BUT KEPT IT OPEN WHEN THE CASE IS CALLED UPON. IT IS REALLY STRANGE THAT WHEN THE ADJOURNMENT FOR FINAL HEARING WAS BEING OPPOSED THE ADVOCATE FOR CHANDIGARH ONLY RAISED THE QUESTION OF 20%. IT HAS NOW BECOME SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED FOR FINAL DECISION OF THE CASE WITHOUT ANY FURTHER LOSS OF TIME BUT ARE INTERESTED FOR 20% PAYMENT ONLY FOR SOME PETITITIONERS, WHICH HAS BECOME MEANINGLESS SINCE AFTER FINAL DECISION THE PAYMENT WILL HAVE TO BE MADE PER FORCE TO ALL THE PENSIONERS ON OUR WINNING THEN WHY THERE IS HARPING ONLY FOR 20% AND THAT TOO OF WHAT. 

THIS IS ANOTHER PLOY TO HELP LIC TO GET THE FINAL DECISION DELAYED AND NOT TO ACHIEVE THE FINAL VICTORY FOR ALL THE PENSIONERS. PL CONSIDER WHETHER THE FINAL VICTORY AND PAYMENT TO ALL THE PENSIONERS IS DESIRED OR THE CHANDIGARH PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO PULL OUR LEGS IN THE NAME OF 20% ONLY AND THAT TOO TO A LIMITED NUMBER OF PENSIONERS WHO ARE PETITIONERS THERE.

IT IS CLEAR THAT WHILE AIRIEF AND JAIPUR ARE FIGHTING FOR ALL THE PENSIONERS PANCHKULA UNIT HAS CONFINED ITSELF TO THEIR OWN PETITIONERS ONLY UNDER THE GUIDANCE AND CONTROL OF THEIR MENTOR MS MURTY, WHICH IS CLEAR AND BEING AFFIRMED BY ACTIVITIES REPEATED IN THE CASE OF NONPAYMENT OF 20% TO OUR PENSIONERS AND CHANDIGARH PETITIONERS THE QUESTION OF CONTEMPT OF COURT WILL ALWAYS REMAIN OPEN EVEN AFTER FINAL DECISION AND PAYMENT TO ALL.
KML ASTHANA