* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

LET LIES GET EXPOSED

Shri MSM has revealed some startling 
untruth he found in the latest SLP filed 
cleverly by GOI. When a person is not sure 
of winning he becomes desperate and would 
adopt any unethical means to save his skin. 

I am reminded of the Heavy weight boxing bout fought by Mike Tyson and Holyfield when Tyson could not withstand the lightning punches from his opponent all that what he did was he bite the ear of his opponent and chewed it. Well that happened in boxing and when it comes to a sober contest in a litigation the loser would find it convenient to unleash all falsehood to keep the contest going for some more time. Let us see what is the untruth averment in the affidavit filed by GOI in their latest SLP AND ALL THESE YEARS THEY REMAINED UNDER THE CARPET.

1. That the existing pension structure with Dearness relief component was the outcome of sustained negotiation with employees organizations which ought not to have been reopened. The truth is LIC had held talks with various employees/Officers Associations and had circulated  agreed conclusions vide their letter dated 14-01-1994 that the DA will be paid at the same formula as is applicable to employees but while notifying the pension regulations the rates were mischievously slashed to half without authority and arbitrarily.( Refer to Annexure 28 filed by Shri Asthana in the CWP NO 6676/1998) What is arbitrary is unconstitutional as held in SC

2.GOI has stated that the existing classification between two classes of pensioners ( Pre- 1997 and Post-1997 retirees) is entirely reasonable in the circumstances ! How it is entirely reasonable when it violates Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution as voiced in several courts and in a host of judgment pronounced earlier. When such a violation comes to light all remedial steps ought to have been taken by the GOI magnanimously and should have honored the Board resolution which has pointed out.

3. GOI claims to have rejected the Board resolution and only heaven knows when it was rejected  ! If that were to be so why should a letter dated 31-12-2001 from ED (PER/HRD) to GOI was sent to Ajit M Sharan JT Secretary (Insurance and Banking) recommending rationalization of Dearness relief and upgradation of pension in accordance with LIC Board resolution and for AMENDMENT OF PENSION RULES AND ALSO SAYING THAT THE NEED FOR IT AROSE IN RESPECT OF THE CASE OF K.C.MITTAL OF CALCUTTA HC. GOI DID NOT ACT ON THEIR OWN NOTE AND RECOMMENDATIONS which reveals their malafide intentions
.
Let me reiterate that as said by many we should fight the case with all our wisdom which is not scarce as revealed in several inputs received and thanks to the Editor of Chronicle for publishing them.

R.K.VISWANATHAN