* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Friday, February 20, 2015

MC JAIN'S CASE

THIS IS TO INFORM YOU OF THE MOCKERY AND DISRESPECT
PLAYED BY LIC AND DISRESPECT AND MEAN ATTITUDE TOWARDS
THE PENSIONERS. SHRI MC JAIN RETIRED AS RM ON 31/3/1993 

BUT HIS PAY WAS NOT REVISED AND SO THE PENSION. HE, 
THEREFORE, FILED WRIT PETITION THAT HIS PAY BE FIXED 
IN THE NEW PAYSCALE ON 1/8/1993 AND THEN HIS PENSION 
BE REVISED. LIC HAS LOST THE CASE BEFORE THE SINGLE 
JUDGE, THEN THEIR APPEAL WAS DISMISSED BY THE DIVISION 
BENCH BY LONG JUDGMENT AT THE ADMISSION STAGE ITSELF 
WITHOUT ISSUE OF NOTICE AND THEIR SLP HAS ALSO BEEN 
DISMISSED. IN THE WRIT PETITION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF 
THE JUDGMENT, NOTICES WERE DIRECTED TO BE ISSUED ON 
MONDAY THE 16TH AND THE SAME WERE SERVED TODAY. 

TODAY MR JAIN RECEIVED A LETTER THAT TOWARDS ARREARS 
OF DIFFERENCE OF PENSION FROM NOVEMBER 1993 TO FEBRUARY 
2014 THEY HAVE DEPOSITED AN AMOUNT OF RS. 12500 OR SO. NO 
CALCULATION SHEET HAD BEEN PROVIDED TO HIM. HE WAS 
DRAWING PENSION ON THE MAXIMUM OF ZM'S SCALE LESS THAN 
3000 AND AFTER REVISION HIS BASIC PENSION WAS TO BE MORE 
THAN 5500/-. THEREFORE , IT IS MOCKERY. IN CASE THIS AMOUNT 
OF RS 12500 WAS PAYABLE THEN WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 
SPENDING LAKHS OF RUPEES ON THE LITIGATION. IT COULD HAVE 
GRACEFULLY DONE THAT. BUT THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN
HARASSING THE SENIOR CITIZEN PENSIONERS.

KML ASTHANA