* CHRONICLE - PENSIONERS CONVERGE HERE, DISCUSS ISSUES OF THEIR CHOICE * CHRONICLE - WHERE EVEN THE CHAT COLUMN PRODUCES GREAT DISCUSSIONS * CHRONICLE - WHERE THE MUSIC IS RISING IN CRESCENDO !

               
                                   

Monday, September 23, 2013

Aggarwal for second legal opinion



We learn by experience also. Since the matter is lingering from one court to another eg.
from  HC to SC, then SC to HC and now again from HC to SC, SLP after SLP and it is a matter relating to majority of the super seniors above 70-80 ( many of them had died), in my opinion there seems no legal impropriety or any  unconstitutionality/or contempt to individually appeal to the highest legal authority of the country. Hon'ble CJI may or may not take cognizance - that is another matter.

I have consulted some senior advocates here also, and sh Asthana has no reservations on this move.  All beneficiaries have the right to knock the door of justice in genuine cases like ours. When ball is unnecessarily thrown from one court to another just to tease, harass the pensioners and delay the implementation, please do consult some senior HC/SC advocate in your contact also to have  their considered opinion on this move and let us quickly take some tangible steps in the interest of common cause. 

LET THE LEGAL PROCESS ALSO GO ON.

SOLICITING THE FAVOR OF EARLY RESPONSE.
REGARDS
HK Aggarwal