Sir,
AFTER HEARING THE SUCCESS STORY OF
SRI ASTHANAJI, I STUDIED
THE L.I.C ACT AND
OUR PENSION RULES. I AM CONVINCED THAT
H.C RAJASTAN
JUDGEMENT IS BASED
ON SOUND LOGIC
AND NATURAL JUSTICE.
I FEEL
MOST OF THE PENSIONERS
DO NOT KNOW THE
INJUSTICE PERPETRATED AGAINST THEM.
I AM UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHY
THE MILITANT ORGANISATIONS OF
L.IC EMPLOYEES IGNORED
THE ISSUE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
L.I.C. RESOLUTION FROM NOV.2001 TILL
2007 WHEN SRI ASTHANA
INITIATED THE LEGAL BATTLE AT
JAIPUR, MORE SO WHEN THE PENSION RULES THEMSELVES
PROVIDED FOR UPDATION UNDER
RULE 56.
I MUST THANK SRI GANGADHARAN FOR
GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY
TO EXPRESS MY VIEWS THROUGH HIS
BLOG . KINDLY FEEL
FREE TO COMMENT ON MY
VIEWS SO THAT WE DISCUSS. NOW I FEEL
THERE IS URGENT
NEED TO PUT OUR BRAINS
TOGTHER TO COUNTER THE POINTS
RAISED BY L.I.C
IN THEIR SLP, ESPECIALLY ITEM (S) AND (T)
ON CUT OFF DATE NEEDS
SPECIAL ATTENTION. PRIMARILY WE
SHOULD CONVINCE THE S.C THAT
S.L.P. SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED.
H.C OF RAJASTHAN
OBSERVED THAT IF AT ALL THERE IS
ANY SCOPE FOR GRIEVANCE ON THE MATTER RELATING TO SEC. 48 IT IS FOR THE
G.O.I., BUT NOT FOR L.I.C. BUT G.O.I DID NOT
CARE OR BOTHER TO PURSUE THE MATTER
BEFORE THE H.C OR THE S.C.
BUT
NOW G.O.I IS
BEING DRAGGED INTO
THE MATTER BY THE S.C . WHICH MEANS G.O.I
IS INVITED TO PRESENT
ITS CASE ON
SEC.48 WHICH MAY PUT
US TO SOME DISADVANTAGE.
WHEN G.O.I IS NOT INTERESTED TO
PROCEED LEGALLY AT H.C RAJASTAN OR AT
S.C LEVEL, THE APEX
COURT SHOULD DECIDE THE
MATTER EX PARTE AGAINST
THE G.O.I. THEN WE CAN TAKE
FULL ADVANTAGE OF THE VERDICT OF
H.C RAJASTAN AND THE RECENT
PUNJAB & HARYANA
JUDGMENT FAVOURABLE TO US .
L.I.C
HAS NO LOCUS STANDIE TO
PURSUE THE CASE INVOKING
SEC.48 WHICH IN FACT IS THE AREA OF THE G.O.I AND G.O.I
IS NOT BOTHERED TO PURSUE THE
MATTER. THERE
IS NO COMMUNICATION AFTER
THE G.O.I COLLECTED
THE PAPERS FROM THE REGISTRAR OF SUPREME COURT. DID THEY FILE ANY COUNTER
OR ANY REPRESANTATION GIVEN TO
S.C BY G.O.I .
OUR
STRATEGY SHOULD BE NOT TO
ALLOW GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AS PARTY
TO S.L.P. IN CASE THE GOVERNMENT
IS ALLOWED, SOME PENSIONERS
MAY FILE A PETITION TO ALLOW THEM AS INTERVENERS TO
SUPPORT THE CAUSE OF SRI ASTHANA BY SUPPLEMENTING SOME MORE VALID
POINTS .
WITH
REGARDS V.S.PRAKASA RAO - VIZAG
( SHRI